These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19076943)

  • 1. Challenging the rhetoric of choice in prenatal screening.
    Seavilleklein V
    Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 19076943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reconsidering prenatal screening: an empirical-ethical approach to understand moral dilemmas as a question of personal preferences.
    García E; Timmermans DR; van Leeuwen E
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Jul; 35(7):410-4. PubMed ID: 19567688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Informed decision making in the context of prenatal screening.
    van den Berg M; Timmermans DR; ten Kate LP; van Vugt JM; van der Wal G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):110-7. PubMed ID: 16242899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accepting or declining the offer of prenatal screening for congenital defects: test uptake and women's reasons.
    van den Berg M; Timmermans DR; Kleinveld JH; Garcia E; van Vugt JM; van der Wal G
    Prenat Diagn; 2005 Jan; 25(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 15662690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Congenital anomalies: parents' anxiety and women's concerns before prenatal testing and women's opinions towards the risk factors.
    Sahin NH; Gungor I
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(6):827-36. PubMed ID: 18279286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Egg freezing: a breakthrough for reproductive autonomy?
    Harwood K
    Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 18945249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed choice in women attending private clinics to undergo first-trimester screening for Down syndrome.
    Jaques AM; Sheffield LJ; Halliday JL
    Prenat Diagn; 2005 Aug; 25(8):656-64. PubMed ID: 16049990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Postnatal reproductive autonomy: promoting relational autonomy and self-trust in new parents.
    Goering S
    Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 19076938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Antenatal screening and informed choice: a cross-sectional survey of parents and professionals.
    Skirton H; Barr O
    Midwifery; 2010 Dec; 26(6):596-602. PubMed ID: 19250723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Informed choice in prenatal testing: a survey among obstetricians and gynaecologists in Europe and Asia.
    van den Heuvel A; Chitty L; Dormandy E; Newson A; Deans Z; Marteau TM
    Prenat Diagn; 2008 Dec; 28(13):1238-44. PubMed ID: 19058291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A meta-synthesis of pregnant women's decision-making processes with regard to antenatal screening for Down syndrome.
    Reid B; Sinclair M; Barr O; Dobbs F; Crealey G
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Dec; 69(11):1561-73. PubMed ID: 19783085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prenatal screening: an ethical agenda for the near future.
    de Jong A; de Wert GM
    Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 25521973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new ethical landscape of prenatal testing: individualizing choice to serve autonomy and promote public health: a radical proposal.
    Munthe C
    Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 25521972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are pregnant Australian women well informed about prenatal genetic screening? A systematic investigation using the Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice.
    Rowe HJ; Fisher JR; Quinlivan JA
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Oct; 46(5):433-9. PubMed ID: 16953859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does prenatal diagnosis morally require provision of selective abortion?
    Buccafurni D; Chang PL
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):65-7. PubMed ID: 19998168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A qualitative study of pregnant women's choice of nuchal translucency measurement].
    Lou S; Dahl K; Risør MB; Hvidman LE; Thomsen SG; Jørgensen FS; Olesen F; Kjaergaard H; Kesmodel U
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Mar; 169(10):914-8. PubMed ID: 17359736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why do women decline prenatal screening and diagnosis? Australian women's perspective.
    Liamputtong P; Halliday JL; Warren R; Watson F; Bell RJ
    Women Health; 2003; 37(2):89-108. PubMed ID: 12733555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Informed consent: providing information about prenatal examinations.
    Dahl K; Kesmodel U; Hvidman L; Olesen F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1420-5. PubMed ID: 17260215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rethinking autonomy in the context of prenatal screening decision-making.
    García E; Timmermans DR; van Leeuwen E
    Prenat Diagn; 2008 Feb; 28(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 18186151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does offering and performing prenatal screening influence women's attachment to their unborn child? A longitudinal randomized controlled trial.
    Kleinveld JH; Timmermans DR; van den Berg M; van Eijk JT; Ten Kate LP
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Aug; 27(8):757-64. PubMed ID: 17546705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.