170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19077924)
1. Use of cervical collar after single-level anterior cervical fusion with plate: is it necessary?
Campbell MJ; Carreon LY; Traynelis V; Anderson PA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 19077924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Best NM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients.
Sasso RC; Smucker JD; Hacker RJ; Heller JG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2933-40; discussion 2941-2. PubMed ID: 18091483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic plates in anterior cervical fusion surgery: graft settling and cervical alignment.
Ghahreman A; Rao PJ; Ferch RD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1567-71. PubMed ID: 19564766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiographic and clinical outcomes following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and allograft fusion without plate placement or cervical collar.
Jagannathan J; Shaffrey CI; Oskouian RJ; Dumont AS; Herrold C; Sansur CA; Jane JA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2008 May; 8(5):420-8. PubMed ID: 18447687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implant complications, fusion, loss of lordosis, and outcome after anterior cervical plating with dynamic or rigid plates: two-year results of a multi-centric, randomized, controlled study.
Pitzen TR; Chrobok J; Stulik J; Ruffing S; Drumm J; Sova L; Kucera R; Vyskocil T; Steudel WI
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 19287352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of plate position on clinical outcome after anterior cervical spine surgery.
Ipsen BJ; Kim DH; Jenis LG; Tromanhauser SG; Banco RJ
Spine J; 2007; 7(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 17998122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictors of outcome after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a multivariate analysis.
Anderson PA; Subach BR; Riew KD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 19139666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-year fusion and clinical outcomes in 224 patients treated with a single-level instrumented posterolateral fusion with iliac crest bone graft.
Dimar JR; Glassman SD; Burkus JK; Pryor PW; Hardacker JW; Carreon LY
Spine J; 2009 Nov; 9(11):880-5. PubMed ID: 19447682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with implantable titanium cage: initial impressions, patient outcomes and comparison to fusion with allograft.
Moreland DB; Asch HL; Clabeaux DE; Castiglia GJ; Czajka GA; Lewis PJ; Egnatchik JG; Cappuccino A; Huynh L
Spine J; 2004; 4(2):184-91; discussion 191. PubMed ID: 15016396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of anterior cervical fusion after two-level discectomy or single-level corpectomy: sagittal alignment, cervical lordosis, graft collapse, and adjacent-level ossification.
Park Y; Maeda T; Cho W; Riew KD
Spine J; 2010 Mar; 10(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 19850532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized, prospective, and controlled clinical trial of pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation for cervical fusion.
Foley KT; Mroz TE; Arnold PM; Chandler HC; Dixon RA; Girasole GJ; Renkens KL; Riew KD; Sasso RC; Smith RC; Tung H; Wecht DA; Whiting DM
Spine J; 2008; 8(3):436-42. PubMed ID: 17983841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short-term comparison of cervical fusion with static and dynamic plating using computerized motion analysis.
Goldberg G; Albert TJ; Vaccaro AR; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Wharton N
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jun; 32(13):E371-5. PubMed ID: 17545900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective randomized study comparing a cervical carbon fiber cage to the Smith-Robinson technique with allograft and plating: up to 24 months follow-up.
Ryu SI; Mitchell M; Kim DH
Eur Spine J; 2006 Feb; 15(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 15980998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Sasso RC; Anderson PA; Riew KD; Heller JG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Sep; 93(18):1684-92. PubMed ID: 21938372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does rigid instrumentation increase the fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?
Samartzis D; Shen FH; Lyon C; Phillips M; Goldberg EJ; An HS
Spine J; 2004; 4(6):636-43. PubMed ID: 15541695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Motion analysis of bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial.
Sasso RC; Best NM; Metcalf NH; Anderson PA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 18679092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial.
Phillips FM; Lee JY; Geisler FH; Cappuccino A; Chaput CD; DeVine JG; Reah C; Gilder KM; Howell KM; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jul; 38(15):E907-18. PubMed ID: 23591659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does a zero-profile anchored cage offer additional stabilization as anterior cervical plate?
Lee YS; Kim YB; Park SW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 May; 40(10):E563-70. PubMed ID: 25955093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
