341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19078921)
1. Potential effects of electronic laboratory reporting on improving timeliness of infectious disease notification--Florida, 2002-2006.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2008 Dec; 57(49):1325-8. PubMed ID: 19078921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of electronic laboratory reporting on hepatitis A surveillance in New York City.
Moore KM; Reddy V; Kapell D; Balter S
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2008; 14(5):437-41. PubMed ID: 18708886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Timeliness of case reporting in the Swedish statutory surveillance of communicable diseases 1998--2002.
Jansson A; Arneborn M; Skärlund K; Ekdahl K
Scand J Infect Dis; 2004; 36(11-12):865-72. PubMed ID: 15764175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electronic laboratory reporting for the infectious diseases physician and clinical microbiologist.
Wurtz R; Cameron BJ
Clin Infect Dis; 2005 Jun; 40(11):1638-43. PubMed ID: 15889362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electronic reporting improves timeliness and completeness of infectious disease notification, The Netherlands, 2003.
Ward M; Brandsema P; van Straten E; Bosman A
Euro Surveill; 2005 Jan; 10(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15701937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Study on the timeliness of the notifiable communicable diseases surveillance system in Fujian province, China, 2004].
Hong RT; Ou JM; Zhang CM; Huang WL; Xie ZH; Jiang AM; Xu LS
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Sep; 26(9):694-7. PubMed ID: 16471221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reassessing provider reporting in the age of electronic surveillance.
Stachel AG; Waechter H; Bornschlegel K; Reddy V; Hanson H; Wen T; Baumgartner J; Balter S
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2014; 20(2):240-5. PubMed ID: 24458313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of electronic laboratory reporting on the burden of lyme disease surveillance--New Jersey, 2001-2006.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2008 Jan; 57(2):42-5. PubMed ID: 18199968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benefits and barriers to electronic laboratory results reporting for notifiable diseases: the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene experience.
Nguyen TQ; Thorpe L; Makki HA; Mostashari F
Am J Public Health; 2007 Apr; 97 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S142-5. PubMed ID: 17413058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Completeness and timeliness of reporting of meningococcal disease--Maine, 2001-2006.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2009 Feb; 58(7):169-72. PubMed ID: 19247263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Timeliness of notification in infectious disease cases.
Domínguez A; Coll JJ; Fuentes M; Salleras L
Public Health Rep; 1992; 107(4):474-6. PubMed ID: 1641446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated detection and reporting of notifiable diseases using electronic medical records versus passive surveillance--massachusetts, June 2006-July 2007.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2008 Apr; 57(14):373-6. PubMed ID: 18401332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ten leading nationally notifiable infectious diseases--United States, 1995.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1996 Oct; 45(41):883-4. PubMed ID: 8927008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Could laboratory-based notification improve the control of foodborne illness in New Zealand?
Simmons G; Whittaker R; Boyle K; Morris AJ; Upton A; Calder L
N Z Med J; 2002 May; 115(1154):237-40. PubMed ID: 12117175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of timeliness of infectious disease reporting in the Netherlands.
Reijn E; Swaan CM; Kretzschmar ME; van Steenbergen JE
BMC Public Health; 2011 May; 11():409. PubMed ID: 21624131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improvements in timeliness resulting from implementation of electronic laboratory reporting and an electronic disease surveillance system.
Samoff E; Fangman MT; Fleischauer AT; Waller AE; Macdonald PD
Public Health Rep; 2013; 128(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 23997286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An intervention to improve notifiable disease reporting using ambulatory clinics.
Trepka MJ; Zhang G; Leguen F
Epidemiol Infect; 2009 Jan; 137(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 18466662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Progress in improving state and local disease surveillance--United States, 2000-2005.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2005 Aug; 54(33):822-5. PubMed ID: 16121122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SmiNet-2: Description of an internet-based surveillance system for communicable diseases in Sweden.
Rolfhamre P; Jansson A; Arneborn M; Ekdahl K
Euro Surveill; 2006; 11(5):103-7. PubMed ID: 16757847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Invasive meningococcal disease in Austria 2002: assessment of completeness of notification by comparison of two independent data sources.
Berghold C; Berghold A; Fülöp G; Heuberger S; Strauss R; Zenz W
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2006 Feb; 118(1-2):31-5. PubMed ID: 16489523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
