These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19079952)

  • 1. Guessing imagined and live chance events: adults behave like children with live events.
    Robinson EJ; Pendle JE; Rowley MG; Beck SR; McColgan KL
    Br J Psychol; 2009 Nov; 100(Pt 4):645-59. PubMed ID: 19079952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agency affects adults', but not children's, guessing preferences in a game of chance.
    Harris AJ; Rowley MG; Beck SR; Robinson EJ; McColgan KL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1772-87. PubMed ID: 21722050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imagining what might be: why children underestimate uncertainty.
    Beck SR; McColgan KL; Robinson EJ; Rowley MG
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Dec; 110(4):603-10. PubMed ID: 21798553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: probability and the mental representation of events.
    Wakslak CJ; Trope Y; Liberman N; Alony R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):641-53. PubMed ID: 17087578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Normal aging affects decisions under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk.
    Zamarian L; Sinz H; Bonatti E; Gamboz N; Delazer M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Sep; 22(5):645-57. PubMed ID: 18763884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decision-making processes: sensitivity to sequentially experienced outcome probabilities.
    Boyer TW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 May; 97(1):28-43. PubMed ID: 17321540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to explain receptivity to conjunction-fallacy inhibition training: evidence from the Iowa gambling task.
    Cassotti M; Moutier S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 20015585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Children's understanding of posterior probability.
    Girotto V; Gonzalez M
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):325-44. PubMed ID: 17391661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Five-year-olds do not show ambiguity aversion in a risk and ambiguity task with physical objects.
    Li R; Roberts RC; Huettel SA; Brannon EM
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Jul; 159():319-326. PubMed ID: 28359540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decision making in ambiguous and risky situations after unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy surgery.
    Bonatti E; Kuchukhidze G; Zamarian L; Trinka E; Bodner T; Benke T; Delazer M
    Epilepsy Behav; 2009 Apr; 14(4):665-73. PubMed ID: 19233314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reality monitoring of performed and imagined interactive events: developmental and contextual effects.
    Sussman AL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2001 Jun; 79(2):115-38. PubMed ID: 11343405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Grown-ups are not afraid of scary stuff, but kids are: young children's and adults' reasoning about children's, infants', and adults' fears.
    Sayfan L; Lagattuta KH
    Child Dev; 2008; 79(4):821-35. PubMed ID: 18717892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The existence bias.
    Eidelman S; Crandall CS; Pattershall J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Nov; 97(5):765-75. PubMed ID: 19857000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improbable or impossible? How children reason about the possibility of extraordinary events.
    Shtulman A; Carey S
    Child Dev; 2007; 78(3):1015-32. PubMed ID: 17517019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of action on children's and adults' mental imagery.
    Frick A; Daum MM; Wilson M; Wilkening F
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Sep; 104(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 19278687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is human decision making under ambiguity guided by loss frequency regardless of the costs? A developmental study using the Soochow Gambling Task.
    Aïte A; Cassotti M; Rossi S; Poirel N; Lubin A; Houdé O; Moutier S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Oct; 113(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 22727674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the composition of risk preference and belief.
    Wakkar PP
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jan; 111(1):236-41. PubMed ID: 14756595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thinking about the future because of the past: young children's knowledge about the causes of worry and preventative decisions.
    Lagattuta KH
    Child Dev; 2007; 78(5):1492-509. PubMed ID: 17883444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Academic decision making and prospect theory.
    Mowrer RR; Davidson WB
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Aug; 109(1):289-300. PubMed ID: 22049669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. College students' awareness of irrational judgments on gambling tasks: a dual-process account.
    Amsel E; Close J; Sadler E; Klaczynski PA
    J Psychol; 2009 May; 143(3):293-317. PubMed ID: 19455857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.