These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19081558)

  • 21. Serial recall of rhythms and verbal sequences: Impacts of concurrent tasks and irrelevant sound.
    Hall D; Gathercole SE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1580-92. PubMed ID: 21563018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Detrimental effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall of visual items are reflected in reduced visual N1 and reduced theta activity.
    Weisz N; Schlittmeier SJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Aug; 16(8):1097-105. PubMed ID: 16221927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Irrelevant speech does not interfere with serial recall in early blind listeners.
    Kattner F; Ellermeier W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2207-17. PubMed ID: 24796760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Retrieval from memory: vulnerable or inviolable?
    Jones DM; Marsh JE; Hughes RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):905-22. PubMed ID: 22250910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Indispensable benefits and unavoidable costs of unattended sound for cognitive functioning.
    Hughes RW; Jones DM
    Noise Health; 2003; 6(21):63-76. PubMed ID: 14965454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of age on involuntary capture of attention by irrelevant sounds: a test of the frontal hypothesis of aging.
    Andrés P; Parmentier FB; Escera C
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2564-8. PubMed ID: 16797613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Memory trace formation for abstract auditory features and its consequences in different attentional contexts.
    Bendixen A; Schröger E
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Jul; 78(3):231-41. PubMed ID: 18439740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The irrelevant sound phenomenon revisited: what role for working memory capacity?
    Beaman CP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Sep; 30(5):1106-18. PubMed ID: 15355139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effects of meaningful irrelevant speech and road traffic noise on teachers' attention, episodic and semantic memory.
    Enmarker I
    Scand J Psychol; 2004 Nov; 45(5):393-405. PubMed ID: 15535808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Auditory distraction and serial memory: the avoidable and the ineluctable.
    Jones DM; Hughes RW; Macken WJ
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):201-9. PubMed ID: 20871174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Manipulations of irrelevant information: suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech.
    Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC; Neath I
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 10881609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A negative order-repetition priming effect: inhibition of order in unattended auditory sequences?
    Hughes R; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):199-218. PubMed ID: 12669758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Boundaries of semantic distraction: dominance and lexicality act at retrieval.
    Marsh JE; Perham N; Sörqvist P; Jones DM
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1285-301. PubMed ID: 24993544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Age-related differences in irrelevant-speech effects.
    Bell R; Buchner A; Mund I
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Jun; 23(2):377-91. PubMed ID: 18573011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of semantic relatedness on recall of stimuli preceding emotional oddballs.
    Smith RM; Beversdorf DQ
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2008 Jul; 14(4):620-8. PubMed ID: 18577291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression: is it a suffix effect?
    Hanley JR; Hayes A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):482-7. PubMed ID: 21928934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A left-ear disadvantage for the presentation of irrelevant sound: manipulations of task requirements and changing state.
    Hadlington LJ; Bridges AM; Beaman CP
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Jul; 61(2):159-71. PubMed ID: 16481085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reduction in auditory distraction by retrieval strategy.
    Perham N; Banbury SP; Jones DM
    Memory; 2007 May; 15(4):465-73. PubMed ID: 17469024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dynamic cognitive control of irrelevant sound: Increased task engagement attenuates semantic auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Sörqvist P; Hughes RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1462-74. PubMed ID: 26191618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.