278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19081558)
21. Serial recall of rhythms and verbal sequences: Impacts of concurrent tasks and irrelevant sound.
Hall D; Gathercole SE
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1580-92. PubMed ID: 21563018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Detrimental effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall of visual items are reflected in reduced visual N1 and reduced theta activity.
Weisz N; Schlittmeier SJ
Cereb Cortex; 2006 Aug; 16(8):1097-105. PubMed ID: 16221927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Irrelevant speech does not interfere with serial recall in early blind listeners.
Kattner F; Ellermeier W
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2207-17. PubMed ID: 24796760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Retrieval from memory: vulnerable or inviolable?
Jones DM; Marsh JE; Hughes RW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):905-22. PubMed ID: 22250910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Indispensable benefits and unavoidable costs of unattended sound for cognitive functioning.
Hughes RW; Jones DM
Noise Health; 2003; 6(21):63-76. PubMed ID: 14965454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effect of age on involuntary capture of attention by irrelevant sounds: a test of the frontal hypothesis of aging.
Andrés P; Parmentier FB; Escera C
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2564-8. PubMed ID: 16797613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Memory trace formation for abstract auditory features and its consequences in different attentional contexts.
Bendixen A; Schröger E
Biol Psychol; 2008 Jul; 78(3):231-41. PubMed ID: 18439740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The irrelevant sound phenomenon revisited: what role for working memory capacity?
Beaman CP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Sep; 30(5):1106-18. PubMed ID: 15355139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effects of meaningful irrelevant speech and road traffic noise on teachers' attention, episodic and semantic memory.
Enmarker I
Scand J Psychol; 2004 Nov; 45(5):393-405. PubMed ID: 15535808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Auditory distraction and serial memory: the avoidable and the ineluctable.
Jones DM; Hughes RW; Macken WJ
Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):201-9. PubMed ID: 20871174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Manipulations of irrelevant information: suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech.
Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC; Neath I
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 10881609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A negative order-repetition priming effect: inhibition of order in unattended auditory sequences?
Hughes R; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):199-218. PubMed ID: 12669758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Boundaries of semantic distraction: dominance and lexicality act at retrieval.
Marsh JE; Perham N; Sörqvist P; Jones DM
Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1285-301. PubMed ID: 24993544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Age-related differences in irrelevant-speech effects.
Bell R; Buchner A; Mund I
Psychol Aging; 2008 Jun; 23(2):377-91. PubMed ID: 18573011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of semantic relatedness on recall of stimuli preceding emotional oddballs.
Smith RM; Beversdorf DQ
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2008 Jul; 14(4):620-8. PubMed ID: 18577291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression: is it a suffix effect?
Hanley JR; Hayes A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):482-7. PubMed ID: 21928934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A left-ear disadvantage for the presentation of irrelevant sound: manipulations of task requirements and changing state.
Hadlington LJ; Bridges AM; Beaman CP
Brain Cogn; 2006 Jul; 61(2):159-71. PubMed ID: 16481085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reduction in auditory distraction by retrieval strategy.
Perham N; Banbury SP; Jones DM
Memory; 2007 May; 15(4):465-73. PubMed ID: 17469024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dynamic cognitive control of irrelevant sound: Increased task engagement attenuates semantic auditory distraction.
Marsh JE; Sörqvist P; Hughes RW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1462-74. PubMed ID: 26191618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
