These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19081563)

  • 1. Access to assisted reproductive technology centers in the United States.
    Nangia AK; Likosky DS; Wang D
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(3):745-61. PubMed ID: 19081563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distribution of male infertility specialists in relation to the male population and assisted reproductive technology centers in the United States.
    Nangia AK; Likosky DS; Wang D
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Jul; 94(2):599-609. PubMed ID: 19361796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments.
    Henne MB; Bundorf MK
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 17482603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred.
    Dickey RP
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1554-61. PubMed ID: 17481621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The status of public reporting of clinical outcomes in assisted reproductive technology.
    Kushnir VA; Vidali A; Barad DH; Gleicher N
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):736-41. PubMed ID: 23755956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Geographic access to assisted reproductive technology health care in the United States: a population-based cross-sectional study.
    Harris JA; Menke MN; Haefner JK; Moniz MH; Perumalswami CR
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Apr; 107(4):1023-1027. PubMed ID: 28314508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low priority level for infertility services within the public health sector: a Brazilian case study.
    Makuch MY; Petta CA; Osis MJ; Bahamondes L
    Hum Reprod; 2010 Feb; 25(2):430-5. PubMed ID: 19920065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coverage and current practice patterns regarding assisted reproduction techniques.
    Navarro JL; Castilla JA; Martínez L; Hernández E; Fontes J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 May; 138(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 18384927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2002 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1356-64. PubMed ID: 17070192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro fertilization availability and utilization in the United States: a study of demographic, social, and economic factors.
    Hammoud AO; Gibson M; Stanford J; White G; Carrell DT; Peterson M
    Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1630-5. PubMed ID: 18539275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fifteen-year trend in the use of reproductive surgery in women in the United States.
    Ketefian A; Hu J; Bartolucci AA; Azziz R;
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Aug; 92(2):727-35. PubMed ID: 18823883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cultural factors contributing to health care disparities among patients with infertility in Midwestern United States.
    Missmer SA; Seifer DB; Jain T
    Fertil Steril; 2011 May; 95(6):1943-9. PubMed ID: 21420677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Geographic disparities in access to the medical home among US CSHCN.
    Singh GK; Strickland BB; Ghandour RM; van Dyck PC
    Pediatrics; 2009 Dec; 124 Suppl 4():S352-60. PubMed ID: 19948599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How does lack of insurance affect use of intensive care? A population-based study.
    Danis M; Linde-Zwirble WT; Astor A; Lidicker JR; Angus DC
    Crit Care Med; 2006 Aug; 34(8):2043-8. PubMed ID: 16763518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproductive health services for adolescents under the State Children's Health Insurance Program.
    Gold RB; Sonfield A
    Fam Plann Perspect; 2001; 33(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 11330855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disparities in Assisted Reproductive Technology Utilization by Race and Ethnicity, United States, 2014: A Commentary.
    Dieke AC; Zhang Y; Kissin DM; Barfield WD; Boulet SL
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2017 Jun; 26(6):605-608. PubMed ID: 28586255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Infertility and assisted reproduction in Denmark. Epidemiology and psychosocial consequences.
    Schmidt L
    Dan Med Bull; 2006 Nov; 53(4):390-417. PubMed ID: 17150146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Insurance mandates, embryo transfer, outcomes--the link is tenuous.
    Banks NK; Norian JM; Bundorf MK; Henne MB
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Dec; 94(7):2776-9. PubMed ID: 20579988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Access to artificial reproduction technology in the Nordic countries in 2004.
    Sol Olafsdottir H; Wikland M; Möller A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 19241225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.