283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19081736)
1. Critical lower-limb ischemia: the diagnostic performance of dual-phase injection MR angiography (including high-resolution distal imaging) compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Owen AR; Robertson IR; Annamalai G; Roditi GH; Edwards RD; Murray LS; Moss JG
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Feb; 20(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 19081736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of critical limb ischemia in patients with diabetes: comparison of MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
Lapeyre M; Kobeiter H; Desgranges P; Rahmouni A; Becquemin JP; Luciani A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Dec; 185(6):1641-50. PubMed ID: 16304027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peripheral arteries in diabetic patients: standard bolus-chase and time-resolved MR angiography.
Andreisek G; Pfammatter T; Goepfert K; Nanz D; Hervo P; Koppensteiner R; Weishaupt D
Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):610-20. PubMed ID: 17179394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of gadofosveset-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography for lower-extremity peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
Grijalba FU; Esandi MC
Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 20105092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Routine use of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.
Deutschmann HA; Schoellnast H; Portugaller HR; Preidler KW; Reittner P; Tillich M; Pilger E; Szolar DH
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2006; 29(5):762-70. PubMed ID: 16625410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of distal lower-extremity bypass surgery: comparison with duplex ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography.
Meissner OA; Verrel F; Tató F; Siebert U; Ramirez H; Ruppert V; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Nov; 15(11):1269-77. PubMed ID: 15525747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Berg F; Bangard C; Bovenschulte H; Hellmich M; Nijenhuis M; Lackner K; Gossmann A
Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR angiography of the pedal arteries with gadobenate dimeglumine, a contrast agent with increased relaxivity, and comparison with selective intraarterial DSA.
Kreitner KF; Kunz RP; Herber S; Martenstein S; Dorweiler B; Dueber C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jan; 27(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 18058929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T MR angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
van den Bosch HC; Westenberg JJ; Caris R; Duijm LE; Tielbeek AV; Cuypers PW; de Roos A
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):337-46. PubMed ID: 23143021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Critical limb ischemia: hybrid MR angiography compared with DSA.
Meissner OA; Rieger J; Weber C; Siebert U; Steckmeier B; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Radiology; 2005 Apr; 235(1):308-18. PubMed ID: 15716387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
U-King-Im JM; Graves MJ; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Wat J; Trivedi RA; Tang T; Howarth SP; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two-station bolus-chase MR angiography with a stationary table: a simple alternative to automated-table techniques.
Pandharipande PV; Lee VS; Reuss PM; Charles HW; Rosen RJ; Krinsky GA; Weinreb JC; Rofsky NM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1583-9. PubMed ID: 12438059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Diabetic Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia Undergoing Digital Subtraction Angiography: Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Calf Compression at 3.0 Tesla.
Wei LM; Zhu YQ; Zhang PL; Lu HT; Zhao JG
J Endovasc Ther; 2019 Feb; 26(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 30580695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease.
Mell M; Tefera G; Thornton F; Siepman D; Turnipseed W
J Vasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(3):543-8; discussion 548. PubMed ID: 17223303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography.
Kreitner KF; Kalden P; Neufang A; Düber C; Krummenauer F; Küstner E; Laub G; Thelen M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):171-9. PubMed ID: 10628475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography in patients with chronic critical ischemia and tissue loss.
Leiner T; Kessels AG; Schurink GW; Kitslaar PJ; de Haan MW; Tordoir JH; van Engelshoven JM
Invest Radiol; 2004 Jul; 39(7):435-44. PubMed ID: 15194915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR angiography of infrapopliteal arteries in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease by using Gadofosveset at 3.0 T: diagnostic accuracy compared with selective DSA.
Bonel HM; Saar B; Hoppe H; Keo HH; Husmann M; Nikolaou K; Ludwig K; Szucs-Farkas Z; Srivastav S; Kickuth R
Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):879-90. PubMed ID: 19864508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stenosis detection with MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in dysfunctional hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts.
Froger CL; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Douwes-Draaijer P; Cuypers PW; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):284-91. PubMed ID: 15618386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities: standard-dose vs. high-dose gadodiamide injection.
Krause U; Kroencke T; Spielhaupter E; Taupitz M; Kenn W; Hamm B; Hahn D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 21(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 15778953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Renal artery stenosis evaluation: diagnostic performance of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography--comparison with DSA.
Soulez G; Pasowicz M; Benea G; Grazioli L; Niedmann JP; Konopka M; Douek PC; Morana G; Schaefer FK; Vanzulli A; Bluemke DA; Maki JH; Prince MR; Schneider G; Ballarati C; Coulden R; Wasser MN; McCauley TR; Kirchin MA; Pirovano G
Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):273-85. PubMed ID: 18372471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
