138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1908215)
21. Planning for end-of-life care.
Tobler L
NCSL Legisbrief; 2010; 18(34):1-2. PubMed ID: 20737756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Death with dignity in Mississippi? An analysis of Mississippi's Natural Death Act.
Vitiello M
Miss Law J; 1984; 54(3&4):459-507. PubMed ID: 11652509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Terri Schiavo and the law.
Marks TC
Albany Law Rev; 2004; 67(3):843-7. PubMed ID: 15551518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Living will statutes: the first decade.
Gelfand G
Wis L Rev; 1987; 5(5):737-822. PubMed ID: 11650367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The aftermath of the Cruzan case in the United States.
Harvey JC
Diskussionsforum Med Ethik; 1993; (9-10):LII-LIV. PubMed ID: 8012269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Ethical problems in living will legislation.
Hughes R
J Relig Aging; 1988; 5(1-2):35-50. PubMed ID: 11652837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Talking to patients about end-of-life care.
Whisnant R
Minn Med; 2004 Jan; 87(1):8. PubMed ID: 14977261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Living wills and advance directives in South African Law.
Skeen A
Med Law; 2004; 23(4):937-43. PubMed ID: 15685928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Attitudes and behaviors of Japanese physicians concerning withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for end-of-life patients: results from an Internet survey.
Bito S; Asai A
BMC Med Ethics; 2007 Jun; 8():7. PubMed ID: 17577420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Physician-assisted suicide and advance directives concerning life support.
Gockerman JP; Halperin EC; Magrinat GC; Hendrix BM; Peters WP
N C Med J; 1993 Jul; 54(7):312-6; discussion 316-20. PubMed ID: 8394511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. What does Cruzan mean to the practicing physician?
White BD; Siegler M; Singer PA; Iserson KV
Arch Intern Med; 1991 May; 151(5):925-8. PubMed ID: 2025139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law.
Tarantino LM
Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Do physicians' own preferences for life-sustaining treatment influence their perceptions of patients' preferences?
Schneiderman LJ; Kaplan RM; Pearlman RA; Teetzel H
J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 8490215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Acceptance and validation of advanced directives--ethical and clinical considerations].
Sass HM; Kielstein R
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997; 147(6):121-4. PubMed ID: 9214147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The case of the coercive family.
Marshall PA; Hartz J; Tan SY
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(1):135-6; discussion 136-42. PubMed ID: 8032514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Patients should not always come first in treatment decisions.
Strong C
J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 8490224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Withdrawing nutritional life support: a constitutional right or murder?
Cotton P
Med World News; 1986 Feb; 27(3):11-2, 15. PubMed ID: 10311452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The controversy over artificial hydration and nutrition.
Burke WJ; Pullicino P; Coverdale JF
Neurology; 2007 Jan; 68(5):391-2; author reply 392. PubMed ID: 17265563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The controversy over artificial hydration and nutrition.
Cochrane T; Truog RD
Neurology; 2007 Jan; 68(5):391; author reply 392. PubMed ID: 17261691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The controversy over artificial hydration and nutrition.
Bernat JL; Beresford HR
Neurology; 2006 Jun; 66(11):1618-9. PubMed ID: 16769929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
