These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19082895)

  • 1. PET parametric imaging improved by global-two-stage method.
    Tomasi G; Bertoldo A; Cobelli C
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2009 Feb; 37(2):419-27. PubMed ID: 19082895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Global-two-stage filtering of clinical PET parametric maps: application to [(11)C]-(R)-PK11195.
    Tomasi G; Bertoldo A; Cobelli C; Pavese N; Tai YF; Hammers A; Turkheimer FE
    Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(3):942-53. PubMed ID: 21195193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reconstruction of 2D PET data with Monte Carlo generated system matrix for generalized natural pixels.
    Vandenberghe S; Staelens S; Byrne CL; Soares EJ; Lemahieu I; Glick SJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(12):3105-25. PubMed ID: 16757866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhanced parameter estimation methods for noisy SPECT data.
    Wen L; Eberl S; Choi HC; Feng DD; Fulham M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Feb; 89(2):102-11. PubMed ID: 17502121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monte Carlo simulations of clinical PET and SPECT scans: impact of the input data on the simulated images.
    Stute S; Carlier T; Cristina K; Noblet C; Martineau A; Hutton B; Barnden L; Buvat I
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6441-57. PubMed ID: 21934192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parametric imaging with Bayesian priors: a validation study with (11)C-Altropane PET.
    Fang YH; El Fakhri G; Becker JA; Alpert NM
    Neuroimage; 2012 May; 61(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 22425668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A fast nonlinear method for parametric imaging of myocardial perfusion by dynamic (13)N-ammonia PET.
    Golish SR; Hove JD; Schelbert HR; Gambhir SS
    J Nucl Med; 2001 Jun; 42(6):924-31. PubMed ID: 11390558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fast parametric imaging algorithm for dual-input biomedical system parameter estimation.
    Choi HC; Chen S; Feng D; Wong KP
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 16376452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A method for accurate modelling of the crystal response function at a crystal sub-level applied to PET reconstruction.
    Stute S; Benoit D; Martineau A; Rehfeld NS; Buvat I
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 56(3):793-809. PubMed ID: 21239844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Joint estimation of dynamic PET images and temporal basis functions using fully 4D ML-EM.
    Reader AJ; Sureau FC; Comtat C; Trébossen R; Buvat I
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5455-74. PubMed ID: 17047263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alternative approaches to estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters: comparison with the nonlinear mixed-effect model.
    Steimer JL; Mallet A; Golmard JL; Boisvieux JF
    Drug Metab Rev; 1984; 15(1-2):265-92. PubMed ID: 6745083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PET image reconstruction: A stopping rule for the MLEM algorithm based on properties of the updating coefficients.
    Gaitanis A; Kontaxakis G; Spyrou G; Panayiotakis G; Tzanakos G
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2010 Mar; 34(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 19744826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wavelet denoising in voxel-based parametric estimation of small animal PET images: a systematic evaluation of spatial constraints and noise reduction algorithms.
    Su Y; Shoghi KI
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(21):5899-915. PubMed ID: 18836221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatio-temporal diffusion of dynamic PET images.
    Tauber C; Stute S; Chau M; Spiteri P; Chalon S; Guilloteau D; Buvat I
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(20):6583-96. PubMed ID: 21937774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of uncertainties in the CT conversion algorithm when predicting proton beam ranges in patients from dose and PET-activity distributions.
    España S; Paganetti H
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(24):7557-71. PubMed ID: 21098912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantification of muscarinic cholinergic receptors with [11C]NMPB and positron emission tomography: method development and differentiation of tracer delivery from receptor binding.
    Zubieta JK; Koeppe RA; Mulholland GK; Kuhl DE; Frey KA
    J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 1998 Jun; 18(6):619-31. PubMed ID: 9626186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ISWLS: novel algorithm for image reconstruction in PET.
    Karali E; Pavlopoulos S; Lambropoulou S; Koutsouris D
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2011 May; 15(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 21216719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonparametric extraction of transient changes in neurotransmitter concentration from dynamic PET data.
    Constantinescu CC; Bouman C; Morris ED
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Mar; 26(3):359-73. PubMed ID: 17354641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non linear mixed effects analysis in PET PK-receptor occupancy studies.
    Berges A; Cunningham VJ; Gunn RN; Zamuner S
    Neuroimage; 2013 Aug; 76():155-66. PubMed ID: 23518008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Voxel level quantification of [11C]CURB, a radioligand for Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase, using high resolution positron emission tomography.
    Rusjan PM; Knezevic D; Boileau I; Tong J; Mizrahi R; Wilson AA; Houle S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192410. PubMed ID: 29444138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.