These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19083784)

  • 21. Heterozygosity and extra-pair paternity: biased tests result from the use of shared markers.
    Wetzel DP; Westneat DF
    Mol Ecol; 2009 May; 18(9):2010-21. PubMed ID: 19302363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A paternity case with three genetic incompatibilities between father and child due to maternal uniparental disomy 21 and a mutation at the Y chromosome.
    Mansuet-Lupo A; Henke J; Henke L; Blank C; Ernsting A; Kozlowski P; Rouger P; Van Huffel V
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Mar; 3(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 19215885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Population history and infrequent mutations: how old is a rare mutation? GUCY2D as a worked example.
    Hanein S; Perrault I; Gerber S; Delphin N; Benezra D; Shalev S; Carmi R; Feingold J; Dufier JL; Munnich A; Kaplan J; Rozet JM; Jeanpierre M
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2008 Jan; 16(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 17684531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of X-linked short tandem repeat loci in routine parentage casework.
    Silveira D; Silva FF; Jesus PR; Whittle MR
    Transfusion; 2007 Jun; 47(6):1050-3. PubMed ID: 17524096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Overdispersion in allelic counts and θ-correction in forensic genetics.
    Tvedebrink T
    Theor Popul Biol; 2010 Nov; 78(3):200-10. PubMed ID: 20633572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mutation rates at 14 STR loci in the population from Pernambuco, Northeast Brazil.
    de Andrade ES; Gomes AV; Raposo G; Mauricio-da-Silva L; Silva Rdos S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):e141-3. PubMed ID: 19647702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ISFG: Recommendations on biostatistics in paternity testing.
    Gjertson DW; Brenner CH; Baur MP; Carracedo A; Guidet F; Luque JA; Lessig R; Mayr WR; Pascali VL; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Dec; 1(3-4):223-31. PubMed ID: 19083766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Kinship testing with X-chromosomal markers: mathematical and statistical issues.
    Krawczak M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 19083739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. DNA-testing for immigration cases: the risk of erroneous conclusions.
    Karlsson AO; Holmlund G; Egeland T; Mostad P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Oct; 172(2-3):144-9. PubMed ID: 17317060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Structured incorporation of prior information in relationship identification problems.
    Sheehan NA; Egeland T
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Jul; 71(Pt 4):501-18. PubMed ID: 17233753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bayesian interval estimation of genetic relationships: application to paternity testing.
    Goldgar DE; Thompson EA
    Am J Hum Genet; 1988 Jan; 42(1):135-42. PubMed ID: 3422126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Full siblings impersonating parent/child prove most difficult to discredit with DNA profiling alone.
    Fung WK; Wong DM; Hu YQ
    Transfusion; 2004 Oct; 44(10):1513-5. PubMed ID: 15383026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Methods of expressing the strength of expert proof of paternity determination].
    Drábek J
    Cas Lek Cesk; 2002 Jun; 141(12):371-5. PubMed ID: 12238022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Validation of paternity in a father-mother-child trio, by the use of genetic markers. Description of a program to aid in the decision. Determination of the optimal sequence of examinations].
    Chastang Cl; Salmon D; Grémy F; Seger J; Salmon Ch
    Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978); 1978 Apr; 20(1):111-22. PubMed ID: 353726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Resolving relationship tests that show ambiguous STR results using autosomal SNPs as supplementary markers.
    Phillips C; Fondevila M; García-Magariños M; Rodriguez A; Salas A; Carracedo A; Lareu MV
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 19083821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Setting the boundaries of prior influence on kinship relation testing: the case of many hypotheses.
    Hubig M; Sanft J; Muggenthaler H; Mall G
    Int J Legal Med; 2013 Nov; 127(6):1055-63. PubMed ID: 23377380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Computation of the posterior probability of linkage using 'high effect' genetic model priors.
    Logue MW; Li Y
    Hum Hered; 2008; 66(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 18223315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Spreadsheets of a conventional application software for calculation of plausibility of paternity: application to parentage testing with highly polymorphic markers in deceased party].
    Aoki Y; Hashiyada M; Morioka A; Nata M; Sagisaka K
    Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 1997 Jun; 51(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 9301224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Forensic inference from genetic markers.
    Devlin B
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1993; 2(3):241-62. PubMed ID: 8261260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bayesian semiparametric analysis of structural equation models with mixed continuous and unordered categorical variables.
    Song XY; Xia YM; Lee SY
    Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(17):2253-76. PubMed ID: 19472309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.