These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19083845)

  • 1. Use of sibling pairs to determine the familial searching efficiency of forensic databases.
    Reid TM; Baird ML; Reid JP; Lee SC; Lee RF
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Sep; 2(4):340-2. PubMed ID: 19083845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of sibship determination by using 15 STR loci.
    Pu CE; Linacre A
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2008 Jul; 15(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 18511010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bioinformatics and human identification in mass fatality incidents: the world trade center disaster.
    Leclair B; Shaler R; Carmody GR; Eliason K; Hendrickson BC; Judkins T; Norton MJ; Sears C; Scholl T
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):806-19. PubMed ID: 17524061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains.
    Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Mar; 1(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19083724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of FBI CODIS Core STR Loci expansion on familial DNA database searching.
    Karantzali E; Rosmaraki P; Kotsakis A; Le Roux-Le Pajolec MG; Fitsialos G
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102129. PubMed ID: 31476659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forensic utilization of familial searches in DNA databases.
    Gershaw CJ; Schweighardt AJ; Rourke LC; Wallace MM
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jan; 5(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 20739248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Real-time forensic DNA analysis at a crime scene using a portable microchip analyzer.
    Liu P; Yeung SH; Crenshaw KA; Crouse CA; Scherer JR; Mathies RA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Sep; 2(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 19083840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Considerations for the interpretation of STR results in cases of questioned half-sibship.
    Allen RW; Fu J; Reid TM; Baird M
    Transfusion; 2007 Mar; 47(3):515-9. PubMed ID: 17319834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Analysis of genetics and genomics of short tandem repeat loci commonly used in Kinship Testing].
    Li CT; Guo H; Zhao ZM; Li L
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 24(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 18709858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The limitations of kinship determinations using STR data in ill-defined populations.
    Zvénigorosky V; Sabbagh A; Gonzalez A; Fausser JL; Palstra F; Romanov G; Solovyev A; Barashkov N; Fedorova S; Crubézy É; Ludes B; Keyser C
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Nov; 134(6):1981-1990. PubMed ID: 32318826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Searching for first-degree familial relationships in California's offender DNA database: validation of a likelihood ratio-based approach.
    Myers SP; Timken MD; Piucci ML; Sims GA; Greenwald MA; Weigand JJ; Konzak KC; Buoncristiani MR
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Nov; 5(5):493-500. PubMed ID: 21056023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increasing the confidence in half-sibship determination based upon 15 STR loci.
    Pu CE; Linacre A
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2008 Aug; 15(6):373-7. PubMed ID: 18586207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Search for More Effective Microsatellite Markers for Forensics With Next-Generation Sequencing.
    Tan B; Zhao Z; Zhang Z; Li S; Li SC
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2017 Jul; 16(5):375-381. PubMed ID: 28600257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The first successful use of a low stringency familial match in a French criminal investigation.
    Pham-Hoai E; Crispino F; Hampikian G
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 May; 59(3):816-9. PubMed ID: 24502416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increased forensic efficiency of DNA fingerprints through simultaneous resolution of length and nucleotide variability by high-performance mass spectrometry.
    Oberacher H; Pitterl F; Huber G; Niederstätter H; Steinlechner M; Parson W
    Hum Mutat; 2008 Mar; 29(3):427-32. PubMed ID: 18076121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating the probability of allelic drop-out of STR alleles in forensic genetics.
    Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 19647706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparisons of familial DNA database searching strategies.
    Ge J; Chakraborty R; Eisenberg A; Budowle B
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Nov; 56(6):1448-56. PubMed ID: 21827463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of novel "mini-amplicon" STR multiplexes to high volume casework on degraded skeletal remains.
    Parsons TJ; Huel R; Davoren J; Katzmarzyk C; Milos A; Selmanović A; Smajlović L; Coble MD; Rizvić A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 19083751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Familial searching on DNA mixtures with dropout.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():128-138. PubMed ID: 26905597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low template STR typing: effect of replicate number and consensus method on genotyping reliability and DNA database search results.
    Benschop CC; van der Beek CP; Meiland HC; van Gorp AG; Westen AA; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):316-28. PubMed ID: 20655289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.