These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19083846)

  • 1. A discussion of the merits of random man not excluded and likelihood ratios.
    Buckleton J; Curran J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Sep; 2(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 19083846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forensic identification of an individual in complex DNA mixtures.
    Voskoboinik L; Darvasi A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Nov; 5(5):428-35. PubMed ID: 20888313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to kinship problems.
    Slooten KJ; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2014 May; 128(3):415-25. PubMed ID: 24281752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inclusion probability with dropout: an operational formula.
    Milot E; Courteau J; Crispino F; Mailly F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():71-76. PubMed ID: 25559642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of large-scale highly polymorphic microhaplotypes in complex DNA mixtures analysis using RMNE method.
    Zhu Q; Wang H; Cao Y; Huang Y; Wei Y; Hu Y; Dai X; Shan T; Wang Y; Zhang J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jul; 65():102874. PubMed ID: 37075688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resolving paternity relationships using X-chromosome STRs and Bayesian networks.
    Hatsch D; Keyser C; Hienne R; Bertrand L
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):895-7. PubMed ID: 17553082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complex DNA mixture analysis in a forensic context: evaluating the probative value using a likelihood ratio model.
    Haned H; Benschop CCG; Gill PD; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():17-25. PubMed ID: 25485478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating the probability of allelic drop-out of STR alleles in forensic genetics.
    Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 19647706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to mixtures.
    Slooten KJ; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Jan; 130(1):39-57. PubMed ID: 26160753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robust detection of individual forensic profiles in DNA mixtures.
    Isaacson J; Schwoebel E; Shcherbina A; Ricke D; Harper J; Petrovick M; Bobrow J; Boettcher T; Helfer B; Zook C; Wack E
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jan; 14():31-7. PubMed ID: 25280378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains.
    Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Mar; 1(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19083724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
    Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):516-28. PubMed ID: 23948322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Considerations for the interpretation of STR results in cases of questioned half-sibship.
    Allen RW; Fu J; Reid TM; Baird M
    Transfusion; 2007 Mar; 47(3):515-9. PubMed ID: 17319834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploratory data analysis for the interpretation of low template DNA mixtures.
    Haned H; Slooten K; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):762-74. PubMed ID: 22981542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG): recommendations regarding the role of forensic genetics for disaster victim identification (DVI).
    Prinz M; Carracedo A; Mayr WR; Morling N; Parsons TJ; Sajantila A; Scheithauer R; Schmitter H; Schneider PM;
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Mar; 1(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 19083722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
    Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inclusion probabilities and dropout.
    Curran JM; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Sep; 55(5):1171-3. PubMed ID: 20487161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do low template DNA profiles have useful quantitative data?
    Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():13-16. PubMed ID: 25474687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using the Nondonor Distribution to Improve Communication and Inform Decision Making for Low LRs from Minor Contributors in Mixed DNA Profiles.
    Schuerman C; Kalafut T; Buchanan C; Sutton J; Bright JA
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jul; 65(4):1072-1084. PubMed ID: 32134501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A rape case solved by mitochondrial DNA mixture analysis.
    Hatsch D; Amory S; Keyser C; Hienne R; Bertrand L
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):891-4. PubMed ID: 17553092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.