These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19084070)

  • 1. Modeling the hemodynamic response function in fMRI: efficiency, bias and mis-modeling.
    Lindquist MA; Meng Loh J; Atlas LY; Wager TD
    Neuroimage; 2009 Mar; 45(1 Suppl):S187-98. PubMed ID: 19084070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The variability of human, BOLD hemodynamic responses.
    Aguirre GK; Zarahn E; D'esposito M
    Neuroimage; 1998 Nov; 8(4):360-9. PubMed ID: 9811554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterizing the hemodynamic response: effects of presentation rate, sampling procedure, and the possibility of ordering brain activity based on relative timing.
    Miezin FM; Maccotta L; Ollinger JM; Petersen SE; Buckner RL
    Neuroimage; 2000 Jun; 11(6 Pt 1):735-59. PubMed ID: 10860799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The continuing challenge of understanding and modeling hemodynamic variation in fMRI.
    Handwerker DA; Gonzalez-Castillo J; D'Esposito M; Bandettini PA
    Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(2):1017-23. PubMed ID: 22366081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A fully Bayesian approach to the parcel-based detection-estimation of brain activity in fMRI.
    Makni S; Idier J; Vincent T; Thirion B; Dehaene-Lambertz G; Ciuciu P
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jul; 41(3):941-69. PubMed ID: 18439839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative latency and temporal variability of hemodynamic responses at the human primary visual cortex.
    Lin FH; Polimeni JR; Lin JL; Tsai KW; Chu YH; Wu PY; Li YT; Hsu YC; Tsai SY; Kuo WJ
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jan; 164():194-201. PubMed ID: 28119135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of temporal regularization on estimates of the BOLD hemodynamic response function: a comparative analysis.
    Casanova R; Ryali S; Serences J; Yang L; Kraft R; Laurienti PJ; Maldjian JA
    Neuroimage; 2008 May; 40(4):1606-18. PubMed ID: 18329292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detecting fMRI activation allowing for unknown latency of the hemodynamic response.
    Worsley KJ; Taylor JE
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jan; 29(2):649-54. PubMed ID: 16125978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physiologically informed dynamic causal modeling of fMRI data.
    Havlicek M; Roebroeck A; Friston K; Gardumi A; Ivanov D; Uludag K
    Neuroimage; 2015 Nov; 122():355-72. PubMed ID: 26254113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity and power in hemodynamic response modeling: a comparison study and a new approach.
    Lindquist MA; Wager TD
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Aug; 28(8):764-84. PubMed ID: 17094118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Delayed hemodynamic responses in schizophrenia.
    Ford JM; Johnson MB; Whitfield SL; Faustman WO; Mathalon DH
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):922-31. PubMed ID: 15955502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling the hemodynamic response to brain activation.
    Buxton RB; Uludağ K; Dubowitz DJ; Liu TT
    Neuroimage; 2004; 23 Suppl 1():S220-33. PubMed ID: 15501093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonparametric inference of the hemodynamic response using multi-subject fMRI data.
    Zhang T; Li F; Beckes L; Brown C; Coan JA
    Neuroimage; 2012 Nov; 63(3):1754-65. PubMed ID: 22982104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Granger causality analysis of fMRI BOLD signals is invariant to hemodynamic convolution but not downsampling.
    Seth AK; Chorley P; Barnett LC
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():540-55. PubMed ID: 23036449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. fMRI analysis with the general linear model: removal of latency-induced amplitude bias by incorporation of hemodynamic derivative terms.
    Calhoun VD; Stevens MC; Pearlson GD; Kiehl KA
    Neuroimage; 2004 May; 22(1):252-7. PubMed ID: 15110015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fourier modeling of the BOLD response to a breath-hold task: Optimization and reproducibility.
    Pinto J; Jorge J; Sousa I; Vilela P; Figueiredo P
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 135():223-31. PubMed ID: 26908316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A semi-parametric model of the hemodynamic response for multi-subject fMRI data.
    Zhang T; Li F; Beckes L; Coan JA
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jul; 75():136-145. PubMed ID: 23473935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonlinear coupling between evoked rCBF and BOLD signals: a simulation study of hemodynamic responses.
    Mechelli A; Price CJ; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2001 Oct; 14(4):862-72. PubMed ID: 11554805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling the impact of neurovascular coupling impairments on BOLD-based functional connectivity at rest.
    Archila-Meléndez ME; Sorg C; Preibisch C
    Neuroimage; 2020 Sep; 218():116871. PubMed ID: 32335261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative study of one-level and two-level semiparametric estimation of hemodynamic response function for fMRI data.
    Zhang CM; Jiang Y; Yu T
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(21):3845-61. PubMed ID: 17551932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.