192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19084205)
1. [Clinical probability of PE: should we use a clinical prediction rule?].
Le Gal G; Righini M; Perrier A
Rev Pneumol Clin; 2008 Dec; 64(6):269-75. PubMed ID: 19084205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer.
Wells PS; Anderson DR; Rodger M; Ginsberg JS; Kearon C; Gent M; Turpie AG; Bormanis J; Weitz J; Chamberlain M; Bowie D; Barnes D; Hirsh J
Thromb Haemost; 2000 Mar; 83(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 10744147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the unstructured clinician estimate of pretest probability for pulmonary embolism to the Canadian score and the Charlotte rule: a prospective observational study.
Runyon MS; Webb WB; Jones AE; Kline JA
Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Jul; 12(7):587-93. PubMed ID: 15995088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
Rodger MA; Maser E; Stiell I; Howley HE; Wells PS
Thromb Res; 2005; 116(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 15907523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of high pretest probability patients undergoing d-dimer testing for pulmonary embolism: a pilot study.
Kabrhel C
J Emerg Med; 2008 Nov; 35(4):373-7. PubMed ID: 18343077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of pretest probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department by physicians in training using the Wells model.
Penaloza A; Mélot C; Dochy E; Blocklet D; Gevenois PA; Wautrecht JC; Lheureux P; Motte S
Thromb Res; 2007; 120(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 17055556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pretest risk assessment in suspected acute pulmonary embolism.
Weiss CR; Haponik EF; Diette GB; Merriman B; Scatarige JC; Fishman EK
Acad Radiol; 2008 Jan; 15(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 18078902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Practical utility of clinical prediction rules for suspected acute pulmonary embolism in a large academic institution.
Moores LK; Collen JF; Woods KM; Shorr AF
Thromb Res; 2004; 113(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15081559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of patient location on the performance of clinical models to predict pulmonary embolism.
Ollenberger GP; Worsley DF
Thromb Res; 2006; 118(6):685-90. PubMed ID: 16380153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The bedside investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis study: a double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing combinations of 3 bedside tests vs ventilation-perfusion scan for the initial investigation of suspected pulmonary embolism.
Rodger MA; Bredeson CN; Jones G; Rasuli P; Raymond F; Clement AM; Karovitch A; Brunette H; Makropoulos D; Reardon M; Stiell I; Nair R; Wells PS
Arch Intern Med; 2006 Jan; 166(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 16432086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Best Practice Advice From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.
Raja AS; Greenberg JO; Qaseem A; Denberg TD; Fitterman N; Schuur JD;
Ann Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 163(9):701-11. PubMed ID: 26414967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison of three clinical prediction rules among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism].
Ulukavak Ciftçi T; Köktürk N; Demir N; Oğuzülgen KI; Ekim N
Tuberk Toraks; 2005; 53(3):252-8. PubMed ID: 16258884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-invasive diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, anno 2005.
Michiels JJ; Hoogsteden H; Pattynama PM
Acta Chir Belg; 2005 Feb; 105(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 15790199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of a clinical probability estimate and two clinical models in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. ANTELOPE-Study Group.
Sanson BJ; Lijmer JG; Mac Gillavry MR; Turkstra F; Prins MH; Büller HR
Thromb Haemost; 2000 Feb; 83(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 10739372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (the PERC rule) combined with low clinical probability in high prevalence population.
Penaloza A; Verschuren F; Dambrine S; Zech F; Thys F; Roy PM
Thromb Res; 2012 May; 129(5):e189-93. PubMed ID: 22424852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnosis: use of clinical probability algorithms.
Gandara E; Wells PS
Clin Chest Med; 2010 Dec; 31(4):629-39. PubMed ID: 21047572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the clinical usefulness of two quantitative D-Dimer tests in patients with a low clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.
Djurabi RK; Klok FA; Nijkeuter M; Kaasjager K; Kamphuisen PW; Kramer MH; Kruip MJ; Leebeek FW; Büller HR; Huisman MV
Thromb Res; 2009 Mar; 123(5):771-4. PubMed ID: 18814904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary embolism].
Motte S
Rev Med Brux; 2006; 27(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 16608008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DVT and pulmonary embolism: Part I. Diagnosis.
Ramzi DW; Leeper KV
Am Fam Physician; 2004 Jun; 69(12):2829-36. PubMed ID: 15222648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does this patient have pulmonary embolism?
Chunilal SD; Eikelboom JW; Attia J; Miniati M; Panju AA; Simel DL; Ginsberg JS
JAMA; 2003 Dec; 290(21):2849-58. PubMed ID: 14657070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
