214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19084363)
1. A qualitative approach to combined magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Villeirs GM; Oosterlinck W; Vanherreweghe E; De Meerleer GO
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):352-6. PubMed ID: 19084363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate cancer detection: comparison of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and the three techniques combined.
Chen M; Dang HD; Wang JY; Zhou C; Li SY; Wang WC; Zhao WF; Yang ZH; Zhong CY; Li GZ
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jun; 49(5):602-10. PubMed ID: 18568549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Value of endorectal MRI and MRS in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and previous negative biopsies to localize peripheral zone tumours.
Cirillo S; Petracchini M; Della Monica P; Gallo T; Tartaglia V; Vestita E; Ferrando U; Regge D
Clin Radiol; 2008 Aug; 63(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 18625351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The combination of multi-voxel MR spectroscopy with MR imaging improve the diagnostic accuracy for localization of prostate cancer.
Hasumi M; Suzuki K; Taketomi A; Matsui H; Yamamoto T; Ito K; Kurokawa K; Aoki J; Endo K; Yamanaka H
Anticancer Res; 2003; 23(5b):4223-7. PubMed ID: 14666629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer.
Yoshizako T; Wada A; Hayashi T; Uchida K; Sumura M; Uchida N; Kitagaki H; Igawa M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1207-13. PubMed ID: 19031184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combined use of diffusion-weighted MRI and 1H MR spectroscopy to increase accuracy in prostate cancer detection.
Reinsberg SA; Payne GS; Riches SF; Ashley S; Brewster JM; Morgan VA; deSouza NM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 17179350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI spectroscopy in screening of prostate cancer.
Goeb K; Engehausen DG; Krause FS; Hollenbach HP; Niedobitek G; Buettner M; Frangou P; Engelhard K
Anticancer Res; 2007; 27(1B):687-93. PubMed ID: 17348461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate cancer in magnetic resonance imaging: diagnostic utilities of spectroscopic sequences.
Caivano R; Cirillo P; Balestra A; Lotumolo A; Fortunato G; Macarini L; Zandolino A; Vita G; Cammarota A
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2012 Dec; 56(6):606-16. PubMed ID: 23210579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Standardized threshold approach using three-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in prostate cancer localization of the entire prostate.
Fütterer JJ; Scheenen TW; Heijmink SW; Huisman HJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Heerschap A; Barentsz JO
Invest Radiol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 17220729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate cancer detection with 3 T MRI: comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in combination with T2-weighted imaging.
Kitajima K; Kaji Y; Fukabori Y; Yoshida K; Suganuma N; Sugimura K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Mar; 31(3):625-31. PubMed ID: 20187206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate cancer screening: the clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2-weighted imaging.
Tanimoto A; Nakashima J; Kohno H; Shinmoto H; Kuribayashi S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):146-52. PubMed ID: 17139633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the prostate].
Mueller-Lisse UG; Scherr M
Radiologe; 2003 Jun; 43(6):481-8. PubMed ID: 12827263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combined MRI and MRS in prostate cancer: improvement of spectral quality by susceptibility matching.
Scheidler J; Vogel M; Gross P; Heuck A
Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):531-5. PubMed ID: 19353482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical efficacy of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) in the diagnosis of localized prostate cancer.
Saito K; Kaminaga T; Muto S; Ide H; Nishio K; Kamiyama Y; Okada H; Terado Y; Furui S; Horie S
Anticancer Res; 2008; 28(3B):1899-904. PubMed ID: 18630478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy to monitor the prostate for residual disease or local cancer recurrence after transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound.
Cirillo S; Petracchini M; D'Urso L; Dellamonica P; Illing R; Regge D; Muto G
BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(4):452-8. PubMed ID: 18476973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Value of 3D 1H-MRS with body coil at 3T in the differential diagnosis of the prostate cancer].
Wang F; Dai YP; Sun XZ; Guo Y; Chen YQ; Mao LJ; Wang DH; Deng CH
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2009 May; 15(5):431-6. PubMed ID: 19514556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with an elevated prostate-specific antigen level: role of endorectal MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging.
Costouros NG; Coakley FV; Westphalen AC; Qayyum A; Yeh BM; Joe BN; Kurhanewicz J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):812-6. PubMed ID: 17312072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Proton MR spectroscopy of the prostate.
Mueller-Lisse UG; Scherr MK
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Sep; 63(3):351-60. PubMed ID: 17709223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate cancer localization with endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging: effect of clinical data on reader accuracy.
Dhingsa R; Qayyum A; Coakley FV; Lu Y; Jones KD; Swanson MG; Carroll PR; Hricak H; Kurhanewicz J
Radiology; 2004 Jan; 230(1):215-20. PubMed ID: 14695396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in targeting prostate cancer in patients with previous negative biopsies and elevated prostate-specific antigen levels.
Lawrentschuk N; Fleshner N
BJU Int; 2009 Mar; 103(6):730-3. PubMed ID: 19154475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
