276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19085032)
1. A comparison of clinical outcomes with regular- and low-profile totally implanted central venous port systems.
Teichgräber UK; Streitparth F; Cho CH; Benter T; Gebauer B
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Sep; 32(5):975-9. PubMed ID: 19085032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.
Nosher JL; Bodner LJ; Ettinger LJ; Siegel RL; Gribbin C; Asch J; Drachtman RA
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk of thrombosis and infections of central venous catheters and totally implanted access ports in patients treated for cancer.
Beckers MM; Ruven HJ; Seldenrijk CA; Prins MH; Biesma DH
Thromb Res; 2010 Apr; 125(4):318-21. PubMed ID: 19640573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: experience with 125 consecutive patients.
Lorch H; Zwaan M; Kagel C; Weiss HD
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 11443406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chest port placement with use of the single-incision insertion technique.
Charles HW; Miguel T; Kovacs S; Gohari A; Arampulikan J; McCann JW
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1464-9. PubMed ID: 19875065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Technical benefits and outcomes of modified upwardly created subcutaneous chest pockets for placing central venous ports: single-center experience.
Lee SH; Chun HJ; Choi BG
Acta Radiol; 2009 May; 50(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19267272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Peripherally placed totally implantable venous-access port systems of the forearm: clinical experience in 763 consecutive patients.
Goltz JP; Scholl A; Ritter CO; Wittenberg G; Hahn D; Kickuth R
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Dec; 33(6):1159-67. PubMed ID: 20414657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Port-A-Cath implantation using percutaneous puncture without guidance.
Ku YH; Kuo PH; Tsai YF; Huang WT; Lin MH; Tsao CJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 19101767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical benefit of power-injectable port systems: a prospective observational study.
Teichgräber UK; Nagel SN; Kausche S; Enzweiler C
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):528-33. PubMed ID: 21392913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The fluoroscopy-guided implantation of subcutaneous venous ports: the complications and long-term results].
Kluge A; Stroh H; Wagner D; Rauber K
Rofo; 1998 Jul; 169(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 9711285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Follow-up of radiologically totally implanted central venous access ports of the upper arm: long-term complications in 127,750 catheter-days.
Busch JD; Herrmann J; Heller F; Derlin T; Koops A; Adam G; Habermann CR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 22826411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incidence of mechanical malfunction in low-profile subcutaneous implantable venous access devices in patients receiving chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies.
Subramaniam A; Kim KH; Bryant SA; Kimball KJ; Huh WK; Straughn JM; Estes JM; Alvarez RD
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Oct; 123(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 21742372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors predicting subcutaneous implanted central venous port function: the relationship between catheter tip location and port failure in patients with gynecologic malignancies.
Cohn DE; Mutch DG; Rader JS; Farrell M; Awantang R; Herzog TJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):533-6. PubMed ID: 11733967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Totally implantable subpectoral vs. subcutaneous port systems in children with malignant diseases.
Rouzrokh M; Shamsian BS; KhaleghNejad Tabari A; Mahmoodi M; Kouranlo J; Manafzadeh G; Arzanian MT; Fallah F; Anoush M; Abdollah Gorji F
Arch Iran Med; 2009 Jul; 12(4):389-94. PubMed ID: 19566357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Ultrasound guided implantation of chest port systems via the lateral subclavian vein].
Zähringer M; Hilgers J; Krüger K; Strohe D; Bangard C; Neumann L; Warm M; Reiser M; Töx U; Lackner K
Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 16508841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Safety and effectiveness of central vein catheters indwelling with subcutaneous port in patients undergoing chemotherapy].
Ge F; Cang J; Xue ZG
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 88(33):2331-4. PubMed ID: 19087693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An 11-year retrospective study of totally implanted central venous access ports: complications and patient satisfaction.
Ignatov A; Hoffman O; Smith B; Fahlke J; Peters B; Bischoff J; Costa SD
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Mar; 35(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 18329836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Central venous access port-related complications in outpatient chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.
Inaba Y; Yamaura H; Sato Y; Najima M; Shimamoto H; Nishiofuku H; Ura T; Muro K
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2007 Dec; 37(12):951-4. PubMed ID: 18057011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective randomized trial demonstrating valved implantable ports have fewer complications and lower overall cost than nonvalved implantable ports.
Carlo JT; Lamont JP; McCarty TM; Livingston S; Kuhn JA
Am J Surg; 2004 Dec; 188(6):722-7. PubMed ID: 15619490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complication rates and outcomes of 536 implanted subcutaneous chest ports: do rates differ based on the primary operator's level of training?
Silas AM; Perrich KD; Hoffer EK; McNulty NJ
Acad Radiol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):464-7. PubMed ID: 20060749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
