193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19085897)
1. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography findings prior to hemodialysis vascular access creation: a prospective analysis.
Planken RN; Leiner T; Nijenhuis RJ; Duijm LE; Cuypers PW; Douwes-Draaijer P; Van Der Sande FM; Kessels AG; Tordoir JH
J Vasc Access; 2008; 9(4):269-77. PubMed ID: 19085897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility of non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for imaging upper extremity vasculature prior to vascular access creation.
Bode AS; Planken RN; Merkx MA; van der Sande FM; Geerts L; Tordoir JH; Leiner T
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2012 Jan; 43(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 22070856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance angiographic assessment of upper extremity vessels prior to vascular access surgery: feasibility and accuracy.
Planken NR; Tordoir JH; Duijm LE; van den Bosch HC; van der Sande FM; Kooman JP; de Haan MW; Leiner T
Eur Radiol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):158-67. PubMed ID: 17646991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR angiography of the pedal arteries with gadobenate dimeglumine, a contrast agent with increased relaxivity, and comparison with selective intraarterial DSA.
Kreitner KF; Kunz RP; Herber S; Martenstein S; Dorweiler B; Dueber C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jan; 27(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 18058929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accessory veins and radial-cephalic arteriovenous fistula non-maturation: a prospective analysis using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.
Planken RN; Duijm LE; Kessels AG; Leiner T; Kooman JP; Van Der Sande FM; Tordoir JH
J Vasc Access; 2007; 8(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 18161675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stenosis detection in failing hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts: comparison of color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.
Doelman C; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Froger CL; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Cuypers PW; Douwes-Draaijer P; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
J Vasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 42(4):739-46. PubMed ID: 16242563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non contrast-enhanced MRA versus ultrasound blood vessel assessment to determine the choice of hemodialysis vascular access.
Merkx MA; Bosboom EM; Bode AS; Bescós JO; Breeuwer M; Tordoir JH; van de Vosse FN
J Vasc Access; 2013; 14(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 23817956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic pitfalls in postinterventional intraarterial magnetic resonance angiography after recanalization of femoropopliteal arterial occlusions.
Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Kos S; Rasmus M; Jaeger K; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19031180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stenosis detection in forearm hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulae by multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: preliminary experience.
Planken RN; Tordoir JH; Dammers R; de Haan MW; Oei TK; van der Sande FM; van Engelshoven JM; Leiner T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jan; 17(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 12500274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of treatment plans for peripheral arterial disease made with multi-station contrast medium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound scanning.
Leiner T; Tordoir JH; Kessels AG; Nelemans PJ; Schurink GW; Kitslaar PJ; Ho KY; van Engelshoven JM
J Vasc Surg; 2003 Jun; 37(6):1255-62. PubMed ID: 12764273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inflow stenoses in dysfunctional hemodialysis access fistulae and grafts.
Duijm LE; Liem YS; van der Rijt RH; Nobrega FJ; van den Bosch HC; Douwes-Draaijer P; Cuypers PW; Tielbeek AV
Am J Kidney Dis; 2006 Jul; 48(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 16797391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unmasking pedal arteries in patients with critical ischemia using time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MRA.
Langer S; Krämer N; Mommertz G; Koeppel TA; Jacobs MJ; Wazirie NA; Ocklenburg C; Spüntrup E
J Vasc Surg; 2009 May; 49(5):1196-202. PubMed ID: 19394548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound in patients with peripheral vascular disease.
Bueno A; Acín F; Cañibano C; Fernandez-Casado JL; Castillo E
Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2010 Oct; 44(7):576-85. PubMed ID: 20675318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of patient selection strategies for carotid endarterectomy by contrast-enhanced MRA on a 1 T machine and duplex ultrasound in a regional hospital.
Korteweg MA; Kerkhoff H; Bakker J; Elgersma OE
Clin Radiol; 2008 Feb; 63(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 18194694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-resolution 3D contrast-enhanced MRA with parallel imaging techniques before endovascular interventional treatment of arterial stenosis.
Lin J; Li D; Yan F
Vasc Med; 2009 Nov; 14(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 19808715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease.
Mell M; Tefera G; Thornton F; Siepman D; Turnipseed W
J Vasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(3):543-8; discussion 548. PubMed ID: 17223303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A systematic review of duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease.
Collins R; Cranny G; Burch J; Aguiar-Ibáñez R; Craig D; Wright K; Berry E; Gough M; Kleijnen J; Westwood M
Health Technol Assess; 2007 May; 11(20):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-184. PubMed ID: 17462170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: results of a phase III multicenter trial.
Bui BT; Miller S; Mildenberger P; Sam A; Sheng R;
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1402-10. PubMed ID: 20512893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Overestimation of moderate carotid stenosis assessed by both Doppler US and contrast enhanced 3D-MR angiography in the CARMEDAS study.
Nonent M; Ben Salem D; Serfaty JM; Buthion V; Pasco-Papon A; Rotaru C; Bressollette L; Papon X; Pachai C; Fortrat JO; Gouny P; Badra A; Berge J; Le Bras Y; Cottier JP; Gauvrit JY; Douek P
J Neuroradiol; 2011 Jul; 38(3):148-55. PubMed ID: 20728218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Berg F; Bangard C; Bovenschulte H; Hellmich M; Nijenhuis M; Lackner K; Gossmann A
Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
