These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19086195)

  • 1. Comparison of the body-worn CIS-PRO + and the behind-the-ear-worn TEMPO + cochlear implant systems in Finnish-speaking adult CI users: any differences in results with experienced listeners?
    Välimaa TT; Löppönen HJ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Sep; 128(9):984-91. PubMed ID: 19086195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recent results with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant and TEMPO+ behind-the-ear processor.
    Anderson I; Weichbold V; D'Haese P
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2002 Apr; 81(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 11987740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation.
    Geers AE
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):634-8. PubMed ID: 15148189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new audio processor for combined electric and acoustic stimulation for the treatment of partial deafness.
    Lorens A; Zgoda M; Skarzynski H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Jul; 132(7):739-50. PubMed ID: 22668312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Opinions on cochlear implant use in senior MED-EL patients.
    Anderson I; D'Haese PS; Pitterl M
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2006; 68(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 16707916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The acceptance of background noise in adult cochlear implant users.
    Plyler PN; Bahng J; von Hapsburg D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):502-15. PubMed ID: 18367692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes for cochlear implant users with significant residual hearing: implications for selection criteria in children.
    Dowell RC; Hollow R; Winton E
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 15148179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experiences of the use of FOX, an intelligent agent, for programming cochlear implant sound processors in new users.
    Vaerenberg B; Govaerts PJ; de Ceulaer G; Daemers K; Schauwers K
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 21091083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal fine structure in cochlear implants: preliminary speech perception results in Cantonese-speaking implant users.
    Schatzer R; Krenmayr A; Au DK; Kals M; Zierhofer C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Sep; 130(9):1031-9. PubMed ID: 20141488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Envelope versus fine structure speech coding strategy: a crossover study.
    Riss D; Hamzavi JS; Selberherr A; Kaider A; Blineder M; Starlinger V; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1094-101. PubMed ID: 21817932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochlear implantation in elderly patients: surgical and audiological outcome.
    Migirov L; Taitelbaum-Swead R; Drendel M; Hildesheimer M; Kronenberg J
    Gerontology; 2010; 56(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 19713692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New cochlear implant research coding strategy based on the MP3(000™) strategy to reintroduce the virtual channel effect.
    Neben N; Lenarz T; Schuessler M; Harpel T; Buechner A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 May; 133(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 23216089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cochlear reimplantation with same device: surgical and audiologic results.
    van der Marel KS; Briaire JJ; Verbist BM; Joemai RM; Boermans PP; Peek FA; Frijns JH
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Jul; 121(7):1517-24. PubMed ID: 21647889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Boyd PJ
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complications and pitfalls of cochlear implantation in otosclerosis: a 6-year follow-up cohort study.
    Sainz M; Garcia-Valdecasas J; Ballesteros JM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Dec; 30(8):1044-8. PubMed ID: 19395988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical trial results with the MED-EL fine structure processing coding strategy in experienced cochlear implant users.
    Müller J; Brill S; Hagen R; Moeltner A; Brockmeier SJ; Stark T; Helbig S; Maurer J; Zahnert T; Zierhofer C; Nopp P; Anderson I
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2012; 74(4):185-98. PubMed ID: 22814383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audiological application criteria for implantable hearing aid devices: a clinical experience at the Nijmegen ORL clinic.
    Verhaegen VJ; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW; Snik AF
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1645-9. PubMed ID: 18677283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of speech by prelingual pre-adolescent and adolescent cochlear implant users.
    Shpak T; Koren L; Tzach N; Most T; Luntz M
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Nov; 48(11):775-83. PubMed ID: 19951145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.