These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19086757)

  • 1. Assessing disharmony and disaffection in intimate relationships: Revision of the Marital Satisfaction Inventory factor scales.
    Herrington RL; Mitchell AE; Castellani AM; Joseph JI; Snyder DK; Gleaves DH
    Psychol Assess; 2008 Dec; 20(4):341-50. PubMed ID: 19086757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Convergent and discriminant validity of the Marital Disillusionment Scale.
    Niehuis S
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Feb; 100(1):203-7. PubMed ID: 17451027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of relationship-specific incentive and threat sensitivities: predicting satisfaction and affect in adult intimate relationships.
    Laurenceau JP; Kleinman BM; Kaczynski KJ; Carver CS
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Jun; 22(2):407-19. PubMed ID: 20528067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring offence-specific forgiveness in marriage: the Marital Offence-Specific Forgiveness Scale (MOFS).
    Paleari FG; Regalia C; Fincham FD
    Psychol Assess; 2009 Jun; 21(2):194-209. PubMed ID: 19485674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring relationships among communication, sexual satisfaction, and marital satisfaction.
    Litzinger S; Gordon KC
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2005; 31(5):409-24. PubMed ID: 16169824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neuroticism and marital satisfaction: the mediating role played by the sexual relationship.
    Fisher TD; McNulty JK
    J Fam Psychol; 2008 Feb; 22(1):112-22. PubMed ID: 18266538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing how much couples work at their relationship: the behavioral self-regulation for effective relationships scale.
    Wilson KL; Charker J; Lizzio A; Halford K; Kimlin S
    J Fam Psychol; 2005 Sep; 19(3):385-93. PubMed ID: 16221019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening for marital and relationship discord.
    Whisman MA; Snyder DK; Beach SR
    J Fam Psychol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):247-54. PubMed ID: 19364218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing the ruler with item response theory: increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index.
    Funk JL; Rogge RD
    J Fam Psychol; 2007 Dec; 21(4):572-83. PubMed ID: 18179329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Problem-solving strategies and marital satisfaction].
    Kriegelewicz O
    Psychiatr Pol; 2006; 40(2):245-59. PubMed ID: 17037100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity and utility of a multidimensional model of received support in intimate relationships.
    Barry RA; Bunde M; Brock RL; Lawrence E
    J Fam Psychol; 2009 Feb; 23(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 19203159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emotional and physical satisfaction in noncohabiting, cohabiting, and marital relationships: the importance of jealous conflict.
    Gatzeva M; Paik A
    J Sex Res; 2011 Jan; 48(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 19941192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Couple similarity and marital satisfaction: are similar spouses happier?
    Gaunt R
    J Pers; 2006 Oct; 74(5):1401-20. PubMed ID: 16958707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Partner schemas and relationship functioning: a states of mind analysis.
    Chatav Y; Whisman MA
    Behav Ther; 2009 Mar; 40(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 19187816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Burden and marital and sexual satisfaction in the partners of bipolar patients.
    Lam D; Donaldson C; Brown Y; Malliaris Y
    Bipolar Disord; 2005 Oct; 7(5):431-40. PubMed ID: 16176436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reliability of relationship satisfaction: a reliability generalization meta-analysis.
    Graham JM; Diebels KJ; Barnow ZB
    J Fam Psychol; 2011 Feb; 25(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 21355645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlations of the PAD Emotion Scales with self-reported satisfaction in marriage and work.
    Mehrabian A
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 1998 Aug; 124(3):311-34. PubMed ID: 9679289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Qualitative reports of problems in cohabiting relationships: comparisons to married and dating relationships.
    Hsueh AC; Morrison KR; Doss BD
    J Fam Psychol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):236-46. PubMed ID: 19364217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and equivalence of the Spanish translation of the Marital Satisfaction Inventory--Revised (MSI-R).
    Negy C; Snyder DK
    Psychol Assess; 2000 Dec; 12(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 11147111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Relationship Quality Interview: evidence of reliability, convergent and divergent validity, and incremental utility.
    Lawrence E; Barry RA; Brock RL; Bunde M; Langer A; Ro E; Fazio E; Mulryan L; Hunt S; Madsen L; Dzankovic S
    Psychol Assess; 2011 Mar; 23(1):44-63. PubMed ID: 21280953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.