203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19088393)
1. A pseudo-dynamic sub-optimal filter for elastography under static loading and measurements.
Banerjee B; Roy D; Vasu RM
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):285-305. PubMed ID: 19088393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative imaging of nonlinear shear modulus by combining static elastography and shear wave elastography.
Latorre-Ossa H; Gennisson JL; De Brosses E; Tanter M
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Apr; 59(4):833-9. PubMed ID: 22547295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shear modulus reconstruction in dynamic elastography: time harmonic case.
Park E; Maniatty AM
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(15):3697-721. PubMed ID: 16861775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation of shear modulus distribution in soft tissue from strain distribution.
Sumi C; Suzuki A; Nakayama K
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Feb; 42(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 7868147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative viscoelastic parameters measured by harmonic motion imaging.
Vappou J; Maleke C; Konofagou EE
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(11):3579-94. PubMed ID: 19454785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A robust numerical solution to reconstruct a globally relative shear modulus distribution from strain measurements.
Sumi C; Nakayama K
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Jun; 17(3):419-28. PubMed ID: 9735905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of 3D modality-independent elastography for breast imaging: a simulation study.
Ou JJ; Ong RE; Yankeelov TE; Miga MI
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(1):147-63. PubMed ID: 18182693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Viscoelastic characterization of soft tissue from dynamic finite element models.
Eskandari H; Salcudean SE; Rohling R; Ohayon J
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(22):6569-90. PubMed ID: 18978443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Algebraic Helmholtz inversion in planar magnetic resonance elastography.
Papazoglou S; Hamhaber U; Braun J; Sack I
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(12):3147-58. PubMed ID: 18495979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A signal/noise analysis of quasi-static MR elastography.
Bishop J; Samani A; Sciarretta J; Luginbuhl C; Plewes DB
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Nov; 20(11):1183-7. PubMed ID: 11700744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Principal component analysis of shear strain effects.
Chen H; Varghese T
Ultrasonics; 2009 May; 49(4-5):472-83. PubMed ID: 19201435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Travelling wave expansion: a model fitting approach to the inverse problem of elasticity reconstruction.
Baghani A; Salcudean S; Honarvar M; Sahebjavaher RS; Rohling R; Sinkus R
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Aug; 30(8):1555-65. PubMed ID: 21813354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A stochastic filtering approach to recover strain images from quasi-static ultrasound elastography.
Lu M; Wu D; Lin WH; Li W; Zhang H; Huang W
Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Feb; 13():15. PubMed ID: 24521481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coherent plane-wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography and transient elastography.
Montaldo G; Tanter M; Bercoff J; Benech N; Fink M
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Mar; 56(3):489-506. PubMed ID: 19411209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional transient and harmonic shear-wave scattering by a soft cylinder for dynamic vascular elastography.
Henni AH; Schmitt C; Cloutier G
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2394-405. PubMed ID: 19062877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficient implementations of a pseudodynamical stochastic filtering strategy for static elastography.
Banerjee B; Roy D; Vasu RM
Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3470-6. PubMed ID: 19746780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Poro-viscoelastic behavior of gelatin hydrogels under compression-implications for bioelasticity imaging.
Kalyanam S; Yapp RD; Insana MF
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Aug; 131(8):081005. PubMed ID: 19604017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using static preload with magnetic resonance elastography to estimate large strain viscoelastic properties of bovine liver.
Clarke EC; Cheng S; Green M; Sinkus R; Bilston LE
J Biomech; 2011 Sep; 44(13):2461-5. PubMed ID: 21762921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reconstructive elasticity imaging for large deformations.
Skovoroda AR; Lubinski LA; Emelianov SY; O'Donnell M
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1999; 46(3):523-35. PubMed ID: 18238453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of strain-based and model-based modulus elastography.
Doyley MM; Srinivasan S; Pendergrass SA; Wu Z; Ophir J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 31(6):787-802. PubMed ID: 15936495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
