These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19088819)

  • 1. A note on the bias of genetic distances in linkage maps based on small samples for backcrosses and intercrosses with complete dominance.
    Hühn M; Piepho HP
    Genome; 2008 Dec; 51(12):1054-61. PubMed ID: 19088819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the bias of recombination fractions, Kosambi's and Haldane's distances based on frequencies of gametes.
    Huehn M
    Genome; 2011 Mar; 54(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 21423282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The robustness of recombination frequency estimates in intercrosses with dominant markers.
    Säll T; Nilsson NO
    Genetics; 1994 Jun; 137(2):589-96. PubMed ID: 8070668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new strategy for estimating recombination fractions between dominant markers from an F2 population.
    Tan YD; Fu YX
    Genetics; 2007 Feb; 175(2):923-31. PubMed ID: 17057236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting recombination frequency from map distance.
    Kivikoski M; Rastas P; Löytynoja A; Merilä J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2023 Mar; 130(3):114-121. PubMed ID: 36566319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A corrected Haldane's map function to calculate genetic distances from recombination data.
    Casares P
    Genetica; 2007 Mar; 129(3):333-8. PubMed ID: 16900314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New statistical methods for estimation of recombination fractions in F
    Tan YD; Zhang XHF; Mo Q
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Oct; 18(Suppl 11):404. PubMed ID: 28984187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bias in multipoint linkage analysis arising from map misspecification.
    Daw EW; Thompson EA; Wijsman EM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Dec; 19(4):366-80. PubMed ID: 11108646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Random variability of map distances based on Kosambi's and Haldane's mapping functions.
    Huehn M
    J Appl Genet; 2010; 51(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 20145297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comprehensive microsatellite linkage map of the chicken genome.
    Groenen MA; Crooijmans RP; Veenendaal A; Cheng HH; Siwek M; van der Poel JJ
    Genomics; 1998 Apr; 49(2):265-74. PubMed ID: 9598314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A high-density integrated genetic linkage and radiation hybrid map of the laboratory rat.
    Steen RG; Kwitek-Black AE; Glenn C; Gullings-Handley J; Van Etten W; Atkinson OS; Appel D; Twigger S; Muir M; Mull T; Granados M; Kissebah M; Russo K; Crane R; Popp M; Peden M; Matise T; Brown DM; Lu J; Kingsmore S; Tonellato PJ; Rozen S; Slonim D; Young P; Jacob HJ
    Genome Res; 1999 Jun; 9(6):AP1-8, insert. PubMed ID: 10400928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating the numerical effects of ascertainment bias in linkage analysis: development of methods and preliminary results.
    Slager SL; Vieland VJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1119-24. PubMed ID: 9433634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Joining genetic linkage maps using a joint likelihood function.
    Hu XS; Goodwillie C; Ritland KM
    Theor Appl Genet; 2004 Sep; 109(5):996-1004. PubMed ID: 15221138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative linkage: a statistical procedure for its detection and estimation.
    Hill AP
    Ann Hum Genet; 1975 May; 38(4):439-49. PubMed ID: 1190735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association mapping of complex diseases in linked regions: estimation of genetic effects and feasibility of testing rare variants.
    Wang WY; Cordell HJ; Todd JA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 12508254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determining trait locus position from multipoint analysis: accuracy and power of three different statistics.
    Greenberg DA; Abreu PC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 21(4):299-314. PubMed ID: 11754466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A nearest-neighboring-end algorithm for genetic mapping.
    Crane CF; Crane YM
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 21(8):1579-91. PubMed ID: 15564296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A new method for constructing linkage maps of molecular markers: three-point selfcross method].
    Tan YD
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2001; 28(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 11209718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of algorithms used to order markers on genetic maps.
    Mollinari M; Margarido GR; Vencovsky R; Garcia AA
    Heredity (Edinb); 2009 Dec; 103(6):494-502. PubMed ID: 19639011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic detection of errors in genetic linkage data.
    Lincoln SE; Lander ES
    Genomics; 1992 Nov; 14(3):604-10. PubMed ID: 1427888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.