These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19089093)

  • 1. Digitizing radiographic films: a simple way to evaluate indirect digital images.
    Rubia-Bullen IR; Escarpinati MC; Schiabel H; Vieira MA; Rubira CM; Lauris JR
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2007 Feb; 15(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 19089093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating noise in digitized radiographic images by means of histogram.
    Rubira-Bullen IR; Escarpinati MC; Schiabel H; Vieira MA; Rubira CM; Lauris JR
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2006 Dec; 14(6):410-4. PubMed ID: 19089240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digitizing of radiographs with a flatbed scanner.
    Chen SK; Hollender L
    J Dent; 1995 Aug; 23(4):205-8. PubMed ID: 7629323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of radiographic image quality from four digitization devices as viewed on computer monitors.
    Davidson HC; Johnston DJ; Christian ME; Harnsberger HR
    J Digit Imaging; 2001 Mar; 14(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 11310912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer technique for digital radiographic images correction based on the digitizer characteristic curve.
    Escarpinati MC; Costa Vieira MA; Schiabel H
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():228-30. PubMed ID: 12105736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of different image file formats and image-analysis software programs on dental radiometric digital evaluations.
    Gürdal P; Hildebolt CF; Akdeniz BG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 11175274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A model for a PC-based, universal-format, multimedia digitization system: moving beyond the scanner.
    McEachen JC; Cusack TJ; McEachen JC
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Aug; 10(8):914-8. PubMed ID: 12945930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducibility of pixel values for two photostimulable phosphor plates in consecutive standardized scannings.
    Freitas P; Yaedú RY; Rubira-Bullen IR; Escarpinati M; Vieira MC; Schiabel H; Lauris JR
    Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 17119702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Digital radiography: fundamentals and future potentials].
    Doi K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jan; 49(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 2660097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digitizing of radiographs with a roller-type CCD scanner.
    Chen SK; Chiang TC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Jun; 83(6):719-24. PubMed ID: 9195630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Projected digital radiologic images for teaching: balance of image quality with data size constraints.
    Schellingerhout D; Chew FS; Mullins ME; Gonzalez RG
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Feb; 9(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 11918368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methods in quantitative image analysis.
    Oberholzer M; Ostreicher M; Christen H; Brühlmann M
    Histochem Cell Biol; 1996 May; 105(5):333-55. PubMed ID: 8781988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpretation accuracy of a CCD film digitizer.
    Gitlin JN; Scott WW; Bell K; Narayan A
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 12105698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital camera resolution and proximal caries detection.
    Prapayasatok S; Janhom A; Verochana K; Pramojanee S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 16798921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Different pixel pitch and maximum luminance of medical grade displays may result in different evaluations of digital radiography images.
    Laffranchi A; Cicero C; Lualdi M; Ciniselli CM; Calareso G; Canestrini S; Greco FG; Alberioli E; Cavatorta C; Guarise A; Pignoli E; Plebani M; Scaramuzza D; Siciliano C; Verderio P; Marchianò A
    Radiol Med; 2018 Aug; 123(8):586-592. PubMed ID: 29671208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of digital enhancement on the radiographic assessment of vertical root fractures in the presence of different intracanal materials: an in vitro study.
    Gaêta-Araujo H; Nascimento EHL; Oliveira-Santos N; Queiroz PM; Oliveira ML; Freitas DQ; Oliveira-Santos C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jan; 25(1):195-202. PubMed ID: 32506327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Goga R; Chandler NP; Love RM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15314002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gray scale registration of mammograms using a model of image acquisition.
    Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18():401-12. PubMed ID: 15344475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences between QT and RR intervals in digital and digitized paper electrocardiograms: contribution of the printer, scanner, and digitization process.
    Hingorani P; Karnad DR; Panicker GK; Deshmukh S; Kothari S; Narula D
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(5):370-5. PubMed ID: 18482732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digitizing pediatric chest radiographs: comparison of low-cost, commercial off-the-shelf technologies.
    Ruess L; Uyehara CF; Shiels KC; Cho KH; O'Connor SC; Person DA; Whitton RK
    Pediatr Radiol; 2001 Dec; 31(12):841-7. PubMed ID: 11727017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.