178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19089261)
1. Effect of conventional and experimental gingival retraction solutions on the tensile strength and inhibition of polymerization of four types of impression materials.
Sábio S; Franciscone PA; Mondelli J
J Appl Oral Sci; 2008; 16(4):280-5. PubMed ID: 19089261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part I.
Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA
J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 1774680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part II.
Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA
J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 1800721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of tray material and surface condition on the shear bond strength of impression materials.
Wang RR; Nguyen T; Boyle AM
J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 8809248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tear and energy properties of three impression materials.
Hondrum SO
Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):517-21. PubMed ID: 7748444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials.
Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of sulfur-based hemostatic agents and gingival retraction cords handled with latex gloves on the polymerization of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
Machado CE; Guedes CG
J Appl Oral Sci; 2011; 19(6):628-33. PubMed ID: 22230998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polymerization time compatibility index of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials with conventional and experimental gingival margin displacement agents.
Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 24461950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
Payne JA; Pereira BP
Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Setting Time of Polyether Impression Materials after Contact with Conventional and Experimental Gingival Margin Displacement Agents.
Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Ziętek M; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W
J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):182-188. PubMed ID: 27333590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical properties of 3 hydrophilic addition silicone and polyether elastomeric impression materials.
Lu H; Nguyen B; Powers JM
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Aug; 92(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 15295324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adhesion of elastomeric impression materials to trays.
Bindra B; Heath JR
J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jan; 24(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 9049922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of disinfection of custom tray materials on adhesive properties of several impression material systems.
Thompson GA; Vermilyea SG; Agar JR
J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 7853264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of various interim fixed prosthodontic materials on the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials.
Al-Sowygh ZH
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 24559525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of contemporary retraction agents and cleaning with hydrogen peroxide on the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials.
Vohra F; Altokhais F; Thafrah AB; Alsaif K; Alyahya A; Alsahhaf A; AlFawaz YF; Aali KA; Abduljabbar T; Aldeeb M
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2020; 18():2280800019891072. PubMed ID: 31986959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative elasticity tests for elastomeric (non putty) impression materials.
Blomberg PA; Mahmood S; Smales RJ; Makinson OF
Aust Dent J; 1992 Oct; 37(5):346-52. PubMed ID: 1444955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of two types of latex gloves and surfactants on polymerization inhibition of three polyvinylsiloxane impression materials.
Peregrina A; Land MF; Feil P; Price C
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Sep; 90(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 12942064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tear strength of five elastomeric impression materials at two setting times and two tearing rates.
Lawson NC; Burgess JO; Litaker M
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(3):186-93. PubMed ID: 18533981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Effect of different kinds of gingival retraction agents on the polymerization inhibition of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials].
Hou QQ; Ge H; Gao YM
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2023 Jun; 32(3):251-254. PubMed ID: 37803978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
