These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19089453)

  • 1. A comprehensive evaluation of SNP genotype imputation.
    Nothnagel M; Ellinghaus D; Schreiber S; Krawczak M; Franke A
    Hum Genet; 2009 Mar; 125(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 19089453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of genome-wide imputation of untyped markers and impacts on statistical power for association studies.
    Hao K; Chudin E; McElwee J; Schadt EE
    BMC Genet; 2009 Jun; 10():27. PubMed ID: 19531258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comprehensive evaluation of imputation performance in African Americans.
    Chanda P; Yuhki N; Li M; Bader JS; Hartz A; Boerwinkle E; Kao WH; Arking DE
    J Hum Genet; 2012 Jul; 57(7):411-21. PubMed ID: 22648186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analyses and comparison of accuracy of different genotype imputation methods.
    Pei YF; Li J; Zhang L; Papasian CJ; Deng HW
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3551. PubMed ID: 18958166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of genotype imputation in Nelore cattle.
    Carvalheiro R; Boison SA; Neves HH; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS; Utsunomiya YT; O'Brien AM; Sölkner J; McEwan JC; Van Tassell CP; Sonstegard TS; Garcia JF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):69. PubMed ID: 25927950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using family-based imputation in genome-wide association studies with large complex pedigrees: the Framingham Heart Study.
    Chen MH; Huang J; Chen WM; Larson MG; Fox CS; Vasan RS; Seshadri S; O'Donnell CJ; Yang Q
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e51589. PubMed ID: 23284720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of genetic similarity on imputation accuracy.
    Roshyara NR; Scholz M
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():90. PubMed ID: 26193934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imputation of genotypes from low density (50,000 markers) to high density (700,000 markers) of cows from research herds in Europe, North America, and Australasia using 2 reference populations.
    Pryce JE; Johnston J; Hayes BJ; Sahana G; Weigel KA; McParland S; Spurlock D; Krattenmacher N; Spelman RJ; Wall E; Calus MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1799-811. PubMed ID: 24472132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Imputation of sequence level genotypes in the Franches-Montagnes horse breed.
    Frischknecht M; Neuditschko M; Jagannathan V; Drögemüller C; Tetens J; Thaller G; Leeb T; Rieder S
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):63. PubMed ID: 25927638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of reference panels and software tools on genotype imputation.
    Nho K; Shen L; Kim S; Swaminathan S; Risacher SL; Saykin AJ;
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2011; 2011():1013-8. PubMed ID: 22195161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome-wide association studies.
    Howie BN; Donnelly P; Marchini J
    PLoS Genet; 2009 Jun; 5(6):e1000529. PubMed ID: 19543373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extent of linkage disequilibrium, consistency of gametic phase, and imputation accuracy within and across Canadian dairy breeds.
    Larmer SG; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 May; 97(5):3128-41. PubMed ID: 24582440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On combining reference data to improve imputation accuracy.
    Chen J; Zhang JG; Li J; Pei YF; Deng HW
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e55600. PubMed ID: 23383238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enlarging a training set for genomic selection by imputation of un-genotyped animals in populations of varying genetic architecture.
    Pimentel EC; Wensch-Dorendorf M; König S; Swalve HH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Apr; 45(1):12. PubMed ID: 23621897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of genotype imputation based on random and selected reference sets in purebred and crossbred sheep populations and its effect on accuracy of genomic prediction.
    Moghaddar N; Gore KP; Daetwyler HD; Hayes BJ; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():97. PubMed ID: 26694131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strategies for genotype imputation in composite beef cattle.
    Chud TC; Ventura RV; Schenkel FS; Carvalheiro R; Buzanskas ME; Rosa JO; Mudadu Mde A; da Silva MV; Mokry FB; Marcondes CR; Regitano LC; Munari DP
    BMC Genet; 2015 Aug; 16():99. PubMed ID: 26250698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Kijas JW; van der Werf JH
    Anim Genet; 2012 Feb; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22221027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assets of imputation to ultra-high density for productive and functional traits.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; Gianola D; Weigel K; Alenda R; González-Recio O
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):6047-58. PubMed ID: 23810591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genotype imputation for African Americans using data from HapMap phase II versus 1000 genomes projects.
    Sung YJ; Gu CC; Tiwari HK; Arnett DK; Broeckel U; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 36(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 22644746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Practical considerations for imputation of untyped markers in admixed populations.
    Shriner D; Adeyemo A; Chen G; Rotimi CN
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 34(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 19918757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.