217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19090501)
1. A scoring system to differentiate malignant from benign masses in specific ultrasound-based subgroups of adnexal tumors.
Ameye L; Valentin L; Testa AC; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Van Huffel S; Vergote I; Bourne T; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jan; 33(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 19090501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of surgically removed adnexal lesions with largest diameter ≤ 2.5 cm: a pictorial essay.
Di Legge A; Pollastri P; Mancari R; Ludovisi M; Mascilini F; Franchi D; Jurkovic D; Coccia ME; Timmerman D; Scambia G; Testa A; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):648-656. PubMed ID: 28004457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Which extrauterine pelvic masses are difficult to correctly classify as benign or malignant on the basis of ultrasound findings and is there a way of making a correct diagnosis?
Valentin L; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Metzger U; Lécuru F; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 16526098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Timmerman D; Testa AC; Bourne T; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Van Holsbeke C; Paladini D; Van Calster B; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 18504770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance scoring system for assessment of adnexal masses: added value of diffusion-weighted imaging including apparent diffusion coefficient map.
Hottat NA; Van Pachterbeke C; Vanden Houte K; Denolin V; Jani JC; Cannie MM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 57(3):478-487. PubMed ID: 32438461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective external validation of the 'ovarian crescent sign' as a single ultrasound parameter to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal pathology.
Van Holsbeke C; Van Belle V; Leone FP; Guerriero S; Paladini D; Melis GB; Greggi S; Fischerova D; De Jonge E; Neven P; Bourne T; Valentin L; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 36(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20217895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasound methods to distinguish between malignant and benign adnexal masses in the hands of examiners with different levels of experience.
Van Holsbeke C; Daemen A; Yazbek J; Holland TK; Bourne T; Mesens T; Lannoo L; De Moor B; De Jonge E; Testa AC; Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):454-61. PubMed ID: 19736644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group.
Timmerman D; Ameye L; Fischerova D; Epstein E; Melis GB; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Lissoni AA; Testa AC; Veldman J; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Bourne T; Valentin L
BMJ; 2010 Dec; 341():c6839. PubMed ID: 21156740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intravenous contrast ultrasound examination using contrast-tuned imaging (CnTI) and the contrast medium SonoVue for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses with solid components.
Testa AC; Timmerman D; Van Belle V; Fruscella E; Van Holsbeke C; Savelli L; Ferrazzi E; Leone FP; Marret H; Tranquart F; Exacoustos C; Nazzaro G; Bokor D; Magri F; Van Huffel S; Ferrandina G; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):699-710. PubMed ID: 19924735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences in ultrasound features of papillations in unilocular-solid adnexal cysts: a retrospective international multicenter study.
Landolfo C; Valentin L; Franchi D; Van Holsbeke C; Fruscio R; Froyman W; Sladkevicius P; Kaijser J; Ameye L; Bourne T; Savelli L; Coosemans A; Testa A; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 52(2):269-278. PubMed ID: 29119698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unilocular adnexal cysts with papillary projections but no other solid components: is there a diagnostic method that can classify them reliably as benign or malignant before surgery?
Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):570-81. PubMed ID: 22915541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses.
Sokalska A; Timmerman D; Testa AC; Van Holsbeke C; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Jurkovic D; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):462-70. PubMed ID: 19685552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; López-García G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 17(5):434-8. PubMed ID: 11380970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Lerner score, Doppler ultrasound examination, and their combination for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Feb; 15(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 10775998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Power Doppler vascularity index for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses.
Marret H; Sauget S; Giraudeau B; Body G; Tranquart F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 25(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 15846763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Real-time ultrasound vs. evaluation of static images in the preoperative assessment of adnexal masses.
Van Holsbeke C; Yazbek J; Holland TK; Daemen A; De Moor B; Testa AC; Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Nov; 32(6):828-31. PubMed ID: 18925606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound-based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group.
Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa AC; Guerriero S; Fischerova D; Lissoni AA; Van Holsbeke C; Fruscio R; Czekierdowski A; Jurkovic D; Savelli L; Vergote I; Bourne T; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 36(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 20455203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
