These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19090501)

  • 1. A scoring system to differentiate malignant from benign masses in specific ultrasound-based subgroups of adnexal tumors.
    Ameye L; Valentin L; Testa AC; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Van Huffel S; Vergote I; Bourne T; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jan; 33(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 19090501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of surgically removed adnexal lesions with largest diameter ≤ 2.5 cm: a pictorial essay.
    Di Legge A; Pollastri P; Mancari R; Ludovisi M; Mascilini F; Franchi D; Jurkovic D; Coccia ME; Timmerman D; Scambia G; Testa A; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):648-656. PubMed ID: 28004457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Which extrauterine pelvic masses are difficult to correctly classify as benign or malignant on the basis of ultrasound findings and is there a way of making a correct diagnosis?
    Valentin L; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Metzger U; Lécuru F; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 16526098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
    Timmerman D; Testa AC; Bourne T; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Van Holsbeke C; Paladini D; Van Calster B; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 18504770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
    Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic resonance scoring system for assessment of adnexal masses: added value of diffusion-weighted imaging including apparent diffusion coefficient map.
    Hottat NA; Van Pachterbeke C; Vanden Houte K; Denolin V; Jani JC; Cannie MM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 57(3):478-487. PubMed ID: 32438461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective external validation of the 'ovarian crescent sign' as a single ultrasound parameter to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal pathology.
    Van Holsbeke C; Van Belle V; Leone FP; Guerriero S; Paladini D; Melis GB; Greggi S; Fischerova D; De Jonge E; Neven P; Bourne T; Valentin L; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 36(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20217895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasound methods to distinguish between malignant and benign adnexal masses in the hands of examiners with different levels of experience.
    Van Holsbeke C; Daemen A; Yazbek J; Holland TK; Bourne T; Mesens T; Lannoo L; De Moor B; De Jonge E; Testa AC; Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):454-61. PubMed ID: 19736644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group.
    Timmerman D; Ameye L; Fischerova D; Epstein E; Melis GB; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Lissoni AA; Testa AC; Veldman J; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Bourne T; Valentin L
    BMJ; 2010 Dec; 341():c6839. PubMed ID: 21156740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intravenous contrast ultrasound examination using contrast-tuned imaging (CnTI) and the contrast medium SonoVue for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses with solid components.
    Testa AC; Timmerman D; Van Belle V; Fruscella E; Van Holsbeke C; Savelli L; Ferrazzi E; Leone FP; Marret H; Tranquart F; Exacoustos C; Nazzaro G; Bokor D; Magri F; Van Huffel S; Ferrandina G; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):699-710. PubMed ID: 19924735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in ultrasound features of papillations in unilocular-solid adnexal cysts: a retrospective international multicenter study.
    Landolfo C; Valentin L; Franchi D; Van Holsbeke C; Fruscio R; Froyman W; Sladkevicius P; Kaijser J; Ameye L; Bourne T; Savelli L; Coosemans A; Testa A; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 52(2):269-278. PubMed ID: 29119698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unilocular adnexal cysts with papillary projections but no other solid components: is there a diagnostic method that can classify them reliably as benign or malignant before surgery?
    Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):570-81. PubMed ID: 22915541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses.
    Sokalska A; Timmerman D; Testa AC; Van Holsbeke C; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Jurkovic D; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):462-70. PubMed ID: 19685552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in adnexal masses.
    Alcázar JL; López-García G
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 17(5):434-8. PubMed ID: 11380970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Lerner score, Doppler ultrasound examination, and their combination for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Feb; 15(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 10775998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power Doppler vascularity index for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses.
    Marret H; Sauget S; Giraudeau B; Body G; Tranquart F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 25(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 15846763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Real-time ultrasound vs. evaluation of static images in the preoperative assessment of adnexal masses.
    Van Holsbeke C; Yazbek J; Holland TK; Daemen A; De Moor B; Testa AC; Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Nov; 32(6):828-31. PubMed ID: 18925606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
    Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound-based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group.
    Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa AC; Guerriero S; Fischerova D; Lissoni AA; Van Holsbeke C; Fruscio R; Czekierdowski A; Jurkovic D; Savelli L; Vergote I; Bourne T; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 36(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 20455203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.