216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19090501)
41. Subjective assessment and IOTA ADNEX model in evaluation of adnexal masses in patients with history of breast cancer.
Pozzati F; Sassu CM; Marini G; Mascilini F; Biscione A; Giannarelli D; Garganese G; Fragomeni SM; Scambia G; Testa AC; Moro F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 62(4):594-602. PubMed ID: 37204769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Intra- and interobserver agreement when describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terms and definitions: a study on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.
Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):318-27. PubMed ID: 22915506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of ovarian cysts: indications, pertinence and diagnostic criteria].
Marret H
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Nov; 30(1 Suppl):S20-33. PubMed ID: 11917373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Ovarian crescent sign and sonomorphological indices in preoperative determination of malignancy in adnexal masses.
Kalghatgi-Kulkarni K; Kushtagi P
Indian J Med Sci; 2008 Dec; 62(12):477-83. PubMed ID: 19265241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Usefulness of color Doppler in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses].
Caruso A; Caforio L; Testa AC; Ciampelli M; Benedetti Panici P; Caruana P; Marana R; Mancuso S
Minerva Ginecol; 1998; 50(7-8):285-90. PubMed ID: 9808950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The Prospective External Validation of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules in the Hands of Level I and II Examiners.
Knafel A; Banas T; Nocun A; Wiechec M; Jach R; Ludwin A; Kabzinska-Turek M; Pietrus M; Pitynski K
Ultraschall Med; 2016 Oct; 37(5):516-523. PubMed ID: 26126150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Ultrasound of adnexal masses.
Joshi M; Ganesan K; Munshi HN; Ganesan S; Lawande A
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2008 Apr; 29(2):72-97. PubMed ID: 18450134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Pelvic Doppler.
Levine D
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 1999 Aug; 20(4):239-49. PubMed ID: 10457564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Diagnostic performance of IOTA simple rules for adnexal masses classification: a comparison between two centers with different ovarian cancer prevalence.
Ruiz de Gauna B; Rodriguez D; Olartecoechea B; Aubá M; Jurado M; Gómez Roig MD; Alcázar JL
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Aug; 191():10-4. PubMed ID: 26066289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Impact of a multiparameter, ultrasound-based triage on surgical management of adnexal masses.
Berlanda N; Ferrari MM; Mezzopane R; Boero V; Grijuela B; Ferrazzi E; Pardi G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Aug; 20(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 12153670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Use of ultrasound pattern recognition by expert operators to identify borderline ovarian tumors: a study of diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement.
Yazbek J; Ameye L; Timmerman D; Testa AC; Valentin L; Holland TK; Van Holsbeke C; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 19746450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Development and validation of a model that includes two ultrasound parameters and the plasma D-dimer level for predicting malignancy in adnexal masses: an observational study.
Stukan M; Badocha M; Ratajczak K
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):564. PubMed ID: 31185938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. IOTA simple rules for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: prospective external validation.
Alcázar JL; Pascual MÁ; Olartecoechea B; Graupera B; Aubá M; Ajossa S; Hereter L; Julve R; Gastón B; Peddes C; Sedda F; Piras A; Saba L; Guerriero S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 42(4):467-71. PubMed ID: 23576304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional power-Doppler imaging in complex adnexal masses for the prediction of ovarian cancer.
Alcázar JL; Castillo G
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 192(3):807-12. PubMed ID: 15746675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: value of a morphologic scoring system.
Topuz S; Saygili H; Akhan S; Yavuz E; Turfanda A; Berkman S
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2005; 26(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 15857033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Accuracy of the ADNEX MR scoring system based on a simplified MRI protocol for the assessment of adnexal masses.
Pereira PN; Sarian LO; Yoshida A; Araújo KG; Barros RHO; Baião AC; Parente DB; Derchain S
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018; 24(2):63-71. PubMed ID: 29467113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Interobserver agreement in describing the ultrasound appearance of adnexal masses and in calculating the risk of malignancy using logistic regression models.
Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
Clin Cancer Res; 2015 Feb; 21(3):594-601. PubMed ID: 25424853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of Doppler with two-dimensional sonography and CA 125 for prediction of malignancy of pelvic masses.
Schneider VL; Schneider A; Reed KL; Hatch KD
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):983-8. PubMed ID: 8497367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Value of preoperative ultrasound examination in the selection of women with adnexal masses for laparoscopic surgery.
Yazbek J; Helmy S; Ben-Nagi J; Holland T; Sawyer E; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 30(6):883-8. PubMed ID: 17932999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Management of adnexal mass.
Myers ER; Bastian LA; Havrilesky LJ; Kulasingam SL; Terplan MS; Cline KE; Gray RN; McCrory DC
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2006 Feb; (130):1-145. PubMed ID: 17854238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
