313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19090583)
1. Face validity and reliability of the first digital assessment scheme of pelvic floor muscle function conform the new standardized terminology of the International Continence Society.
Slieker-ten Hove MC; Pool-Goudzwaard AL; Eijkemans MJ; Steegers-Theunissen RP; Burger CW; Vierhout ME
Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 19090583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pelvic floor muscle surface electromyography. Reliability and clinical predictive validity.
Glazer HI; Romanzi L; Polaneczky M
J Reprod Med; 1999 Sep; 44(9):779-82. PubMed ID: 10509301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of pelvic floor muscle function in continent and incontinent women.
Devreese A; Staes F; De Weerdt W; Feys H; Van Assche A; Penninckx F; Vereecken R
Neurourol Urodyn; 2004; 23(3):190-7. PubMed ID: 15098213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction.
Haylen BT; de Ridder D; Freeman RM; Swift SE; Berghmans B; Lee J; Monga A; Petri E; Rizk DE; Sand PK; Schaer GN; ;
Neurourol Urodyn; 2010; 29(1):4-20. PubMed ID: 19941278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of perineometer to brink score for assessment of pelvic floor muscle strength.
Hundley AF; Wu JM; Visco AG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1583-91. PubMed ID: 15902162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Standardization of terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and dysfunction: report from the pelvic floor clinical assessment group of the International Continence Society.
Messelink B; Benson T; Berghmans B; Bø K; Corcos J; Fowler C; Laycock J; Lim PH; van Lunsen R; á Nijeholt GL; Pemberton J; Wang A; Watier A; Van Kerrebroeck P
Neurourol Urodyn; 2005; 24(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 15977259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Test-retest intra-rater reliability of vaginal measurement of pelvic floor muscle strength using Myomed 932.
Sigurdardottir T; Steingrimsdottir T; Arnason A; Bø K
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(8):939-43. PubMed ID: 19579139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter-examiner and intra-examiner reliability of the standing flexion test.
Vincent-Smith B; Gibbons P
Man Ther; 1999 May; 4(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 10509062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is there correlation between electromyography and digital palpation as means of measuring pelvic floor muscle contractility in nulliparous, pregnant, and postpartum women?
Botelho S; Pereira LC; Marques J; Lanza AH; Amorim CF; Palma P; Riccetto C
Neurourol Urodyn; 2013 Jun; 32(5):420-3. PubMed ID: 23023961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A digital test for pelvic muscle strength in women with urinary incontinence.
Brink CA; Wells TJ; Sampselle CM; Taillie ER; Mayer R
Nurs Res; 1994; 43(6):352-6. PubMed ID: 7971299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging for grading pelvic organ prolapse according to the International Continence Society classification: which line should be used?
Fauconnier A; Zareski E; Abichedid J; Bader G; Falissard B; Fritel X
Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 17696158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of single and composites of selected motion palpation and pain provocation tests for sacroiliac joint.
Arab AM; Abdollahi I; Joghataei MT; Golafshani Z; Kazemnejad A
Man Ther; 2009 Apr; 14(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 18373938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment in healthy continent women.
Sartori DV; Gameiro MO; Yamamoto HA; Kawano PR; Guerra R; Padovani CR; Amaro JL
BMC Urol; 2015 Apr; 15():29. PubMed ID: 25888237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validating a clinical measure of levator hiatus size.
Boyles SH; Edwards SR; Gregory WT; Denman MA; Clark AL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 196(2):174.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17306670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementing guidance on pelvic floor exercises.
Pomfret I; Holden C
Nurs Times; 2007 May 8-14; 103(19):40-1. PubMed ID: 17518207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of perineometer in the assessment of pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance: a reliability study.
Rahmani N; Mohseni-Bandpei MA
J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2011 Apr; 15(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 21419362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retest reliability of surface electromyography on the pelvic floor muscles.
Grape HH; Dedering A; Jonasson AF
Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(5):395-9. PubMed ID: 19214991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Compendium of review articles and the new standardisation report conducted between the International Urogynaecological Association (IUGA) and the International Continence Society (ICS) dealing with the new suggested terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction.
Chapple C
Neurourol Urodyn; 2010; 29(1):1. PubMed ID: 20025019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Vaginal pressure-pain thresholds: initial validation and reliability assessment in healthy women.
Tu FF; Fitzgerald CM; Kuiken T; Farrell T; Norman Harden R
Clin J Pain; 2008 Jan; 24(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 18180636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The validity and reliability of a simple semantic classification of foot posture.
Cross HA; Lehman L
Lepr Rev; 2008 Dec; 79(4):416-24. PubMed ID: 19274988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
