278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19091498)
41. Spectrophotometric methods for quantifying pigmentation in human hair-influence of MC1R genotype and environment.
Shekar SN; Duffy DL; Frudakis T; Montgomery GW; James MR; Sturm RA; Martin NG
Photochem Photobiol; 2008; 84(3):719-26. PubMed ID: 18435620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Quantitative evaluation of coat-color patterns in artificially produced chimeras of the mouse by means of a microcomputer-based video-image analysis system.
Tachi C
Dev Genet; 1988; 9(2):121-54. PubMed ID: 3383455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Background correction in forensic photography. I. Photography of blood under conditions of non-uniform illumination or variable substrate color--theoretical aspects and proof of concept.
Wagner JH; Miskelly GM
J Forensic Sci; 2003 May; 48(3):593-603. PubMed ID: 12762530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Background correction in forensic photography. II. Photography of blood under conditions of non-uniform illumination or variable substrate color--practical aspects and limitations.
Wagner JH; Miskelly GM
J Forensic Sci; 2003 May; 48(3):604-13. PubMed ID: 12762531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [A comparison of digital planimetry and transparency tracing based methods for measuring diabetic cutaneous ulcer surface area].
Wang Y; Liu G; Yuan N; Ran X
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 May; 22(5):563-6. PubMed ID: 18630436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. GrinLine identification using digital imaging and Adobe Photoshop.
Bollinger SA; Brumit PC; Schrader BA; Senn DR
J Forensic Sci; 2009 Mar; 54(2):422-7. PubMed ID: 19187451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The evidential value of distorted and rectified digital images in footwear imprint examination.
Shor Y; Chaikovsky A; Tsach T
Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jun; 160(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 16191473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Is segmental vitiligo always associated with leukotrichia? Examination with a digital portable microscope.
Lee DY; Park JH; Lee JH; Yang JM; Lee ES
Int J Dermatol; 2009 Nov; 48(11):1262. PubMed ID: 20064189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Quantification of female pattern hair loss: a study in a Turkish population.
Aktan S; Akarsu S; Ilknur T; Demirtaşoğlu M; Ozkan S
Eur J Dermatol; 2007; 17(4):321-4. PubMed ID: 17540640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Infrared pupilometry measured by digital photography].
Slanar O; Urban M; Perlík F
Cas Lek Cesk; 2005; 144(4):273-6; discussion 276-7. PubMed ID: 15945488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Validation of TrichoScan technology as a fully-automated tool for evaluation of hair growth parameters.
Gassmueller J; Rowold E; Frase T; Hughes-Formella B
Eur J Dermatol; 2009; 19(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 19220982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Sex assessment from the sacral base by means of image processing.
Benazzi S; Maestri C; Parisini S; Vecchi F; Gruppioni G
J Forensic Sci; 2009 Mar; 54(2):249-54. PubMed ID: 19207288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Digital image-based flame emission spectrometry.
Silva Lyra W; Dos Santos VB; Dionízio AG; Martins VL; Almeida LF; Nóbrega Gaião E; Diniz PH; Silva EC; Araújo MC
Talanta; 2009 Mar; 77(5):1584-9. PubMed ID: 19159768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A comparison of manual traced images and corresponding scanned radiographs digitally traced.
Naoumova J; Lindman R
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 19342425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Impact of colour digital photography on pathologists' orientation of resected specimens: a prospective pilot study.
Walsh S; Mirza T; Smith G; Hyde N
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 47(3):218-9. PubMed ID: 18771824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis.
Celik E; Polat-Ozsoy O; Toygar Memikoglu TU
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 19237509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Distance measurement based on pixel variation of CCD images.
Hsu CC; Lu MC; Wang WY; Lu YY
ISA Trans; 2009 Oct; 48(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 19541300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Digital photography as a novel technique of measuring ocular surface dimensions.
Koushan K; Skibell BC; Harvey JT; Jankowski HK; Deangelis DD; Oestreicher JH
Orbit; 2008; 27(4):259-65. PubMed ID: 18716963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Photography in dermatology: comparison between slides and digital imaging.
Levy JL; Trelles MA; Levy A; Besson R
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2003 Jul; 2(3-4):131-4. PubMed ID: 17163918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Use of Adobe Photoshop software in medical criminology].
Nikitin SA; Demidov IV
Sud Med Ekspert; 2000; 43(1):32-3. PubMed ID: 10703283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
