BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19091547)

  • 21. Design issues of randomized phase II trials and a proposal for phase II screening trials.
    Rubinstein LV; Korn EL; Freidlin B; Hunsberger S; Ivy SP; Smith MA
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Oct; 23(28):7199-206. PubMed ID: 16192604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The development of phase I cancer trial methodologies: the use of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic end points sets the scene for phase 0 cancer clinical trials.
    Calvert AH; Plummer R
    Clin Cancer Res; 2008 Jun; 14(12):3664-9. PubMed ID: 18559580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical trial design in small cell lung cancer: surrogate end points and statistical evolution.
    Nickolich M; Babakoohi S; Fu P; Dowlati A
    Clin Lung Cancer; 2014 May; 15(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 24485231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Phase-II trials in osteosarcoma recurrences: A systematic review of past experience.
    Omer N; Le Deley MC; Piperno-Neumann S; Marec-Berard P; Italiano A; Corradini N; Bellera C; Brugières L; Gaspar N
    Eur J Cancer; 2017 Apr; 75():98-108. PubMed ID: 28219023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Progression-free survival rate as primary end point for phase II cancer clinical trials: application to mesothelioma--The EORTC Lung Cancer Group.
    Francart J; Legrand C; Sylvester R; Van Glabbeke M; van Meerbeeck JP; Robert A
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Jul; 24(19):3007-12. PubMed ID: 16809726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. GFR decline as an alternative end point to kidney failure in clinical trials: a meta-analysis of treatment effects from 37 randomized trials.
    Inker LA; Lambers Heerspink HJ; Mondal H; Schmid CH; Tighiouart H; Noubary F; Coresh J; Greene T; Levey AS
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2014 Dec; 64(6):848-59. PubMed ID: 25441438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contemporary phase III clinical trial endpoints in advanced ovarian cancer: assessing the pros and cons of objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival.
    Tate Thigpen J
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Jan; 136(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 25455732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Definitions, End Points, and Clinical Trial Designs for Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Recommendations From the International Bladder Cancer Group.
    Kamat AM; Sylvester RJ; Böhle A; Palou J; Lamm DL; Brausi M; Soloway M; Persad R; Buckley R; Colombel M; Witjes JA
    J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 34(16):1935-44. PubMed ID: 26811532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.
    Green AK; Reeder-Hayes KE; Corty RW; Basch E; Milowsky MI; Dusetzina SB; Bennett AV; Wood WA
    Oncologist; 2015 May; 20(5):464-e20. PubMed ID: 25876994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Role of sensitivity analyses in assessing progression-free survival in late-stage oncology trials.
    Bhattacharya S; Fyfe G; Gray RJ; Sargent DJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Dec; 27(35):5958-64. PubMed ID: 19826121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Outcome of Patients With Recurrent Osteosarcoma Enrolled in Seven Phase II Trials Through Children's Cancer Group, Pediatric Oncology Group, and Children's Oncology Group: Learning From the Past to Move Forward.
    Lagmay JP; Krailo MD; Dang H; Kim A; Hawkins DS; Beaty O; Widemann BC; Zwerdling T; Bomgaars L; Langevin AM; Grier HE; Weigel B; Blaney SM; Gorlick R; Janeway KA
    J Clin Oncol; 2016 Sep; 34(25):3031-8. PubMed ID: 27400942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. GFR decline as an end point for clinical trials in CKD: a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation and the US Food and Drug Administration.
    Levey AS; Inker LA; Matsushita K; Greene T; Willis K; Lewis E; de Zeeuw D; Cheung AK; Coresh J
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2014 Dec; 64(6):821-35. PubMed ID: 25441437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Llovet JM; Di Bisceglie AM; Bruix J; Kramer BS; Lencioni R; Zhu AX; Sherman M; Schwartz M; Lotze M; Talwalkar J; Gores GJ;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(10):698-711. PubMed ID: 18477802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Melanoma Vaccine--AVAX Technologies: DNP-VACC, M-Vax.
    BioDrugs; 2003; 17(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 12534322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Oblimersen: Augmerosen, BCL-2 antisense oligonucleotide - Genta, G 3139, GC 3139, oblimersen sodium.
    Drugs R D; 2007; 8(5):321-34. PubMed ID: 17767397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Changes in the use of end points in clinical trials for elderly cancer patients over time.
    Le Saux O; Falandry C; Gan HK; You B; Freyer G; Péron J
    Ann Oncol; 2017 Oct; 28(10):2606-2611. PubMed ID: 28961850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A flexible multi-stage design for phase II oncology trials.
    Tan MT; Xiong X
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):369-73. PubMed ID: 22328328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Trial design for evaluation of novel targeted therapies.
    Farley J; Rose PG
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Feb; 116(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 19853899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Trends in endpoint selection in clinical trials of advanced breast cancer.
    Song SY; Seo H; Kim G; Kim AR; Kim EY
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2016 Nov; 142(11):2403-13. PubMed ID: 27586374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Alternate endpoints for screening phase II studies.
    Dhani N; Tu D; Sargent DJ; Seymour L; Moore MJ
    Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Mar; 15(6):1873-82. PubMed ID: 19276273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.