321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19091649)
1. [Margin status in invasive breast cancer].
Houvenaeghel G; Lambaudie E; Buttarelli M; Cohen M; Bannier M; Tallet A; Jacquemier J
Bull Cancer; 2008 Dec; 95(12):1161-70. PubMed ID: 19091649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Margin status in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast].
Vincens E; Alves K; Lauratet B; Cohen S; Bakenga J; Trie A; Lefranc JP
Bull Cancer; 2008 Dec; 95(12):1155-9. PubMed ID: 19091648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Value of the Van Nuys Prognostic Index in prediction of recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ after breast-conserving surgery.
Boland GP; Chan KC; Knox WF; Roberts SA; Bundred NJ
Br J Surg; 2003 Apr; 90(4):426-32. PubMed ID: 12673743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recurrence rates and analysis of close or positive margins in patients treated without re-excision before radiation for breast cancer.
McIntosh A; Freedman G; Eisenberg D; Anderson P
Am J Clin Oncol; 2007 Apr; 30(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 17414463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of external boost volume in breast-conserving therapy on local control with long-term follow-up.
Jobsen JJ; van der Palen J; Ong F
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 May; 71(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 18234450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Histological margin and residual disease assessment for breast carcinoma].
Sigal-Zafrani B; Fourquet A; Vincent-Salomon A; Fréneaux P; Génin P; Rosty C; Sastre-Garau X
Cancer Radiother; 2003 Nov; 7 Suppl 1():120s-123s. PubMed ID: 15124553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of margin width on local control of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Silverstein MJ; Lagios MD; Groshen S; Waisman JR; Lewinsky BS; Martino S; Gamagami P; Colburn WJ
N Engl J Med; 1999 May; 340(19):1455-61. PubMed ID: 10320383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is radiation indicated in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ and close or positive mastectomy margins?
Chan LW; Rabban J; Hwang ES; Bevan A; Alvarado M; Ewing C; Esserman L; Fowble B
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 May; 80(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 20646871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictive factors for residual disease in re-excision specimens after breast-conserving surgery.
Atalay C; Irkkan C
Breast J; 2012; 18(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 22616572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Margin status after breast-conserving treatment of breast cancer: how much free margin is enough?
von Smitten K
J Surg Oncol; 2008 Dec; 98(8):585-7. PubMed ID: 19072849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of timing of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in patients with positive or close resection margins, young age, and node-negative disease, with long term follow-up.
Vujovic O; Cherian A; Yu E; Dar AR; Stitt L; Perera F
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Nov; 66(3):687-90. PubMed ID: 16949764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of lobular carcinoma in situ in association with invasive breast cancer on the rate of local recurrence in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy.
Jolly S; Kestin LL; Goldstein NS; Vicini FA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Oct; 66(2):365-71. PubMed ID: 16965988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The relationship between shaved margin and inked margin status in breast excision specimens.
Guidi AJ; Connolly JL; Harris JR; Schnitt SJ
Cancer; 1997 Apr; 79(8):1568-73. PubMed ID: 9118040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors predisposing to cavity margin positivity following conservation surgery for breast cancer.
Keskek M; Kothari M; Ardehali B; Betambeau N; Nasiri N; Gui GP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Dec; 30(10):1058-64. PubMed ID: 15522551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Local recurrences after conservative treatment of ductal carcinoma-in-situ of the breast without radiotherapy: the effect of age.
Schouten van der Velden AP; Peeters PH; Koot VC; Hennipman A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):990-8. PubMed ID: 16788762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program.
Kurniawan ED; Wong MH; Windle I; Rose A; Mou A; Buchanan M; Collins JP; Miller JA; Gruen RL; Mann GB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):2542-9. PubMed ID: 18618180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
