420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19091650)
21. Predictive value of endocervical curettage at cervical conization and provider practices in management of high-grade cervical dysplasia.
Barlin JN; Bristow RE; Murillo AM; Zahurak M; Veras E; Salani R
J Reprod Med; 2010; 55(3-4):129-33. PubMed ID: 20506673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Management of residual squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix after conization.
White CD; Cooper WL; Williams RR
W V Med J; 1993 Sep; 89(9):382-5. PubMed ID: 8310692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Partial trachelectomy in the elderly patient with abnormal cytology.
Krebs HB; Wilstrup MA; Wheelock JB
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Apr; 65(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 3982732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Management of stage Ia1 squamous cervical cancer and the importance of excision margins: a retrospective study of long-term outcome after 25 years of follow-up.
Papakonstantinou K; Kyrgiou M; Lyons D; Soutter WP; Ghaem-Maghami S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):625.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24949540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Conization using the Shimodaira-Taniguchi procedure for adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
Hiramatsu K; Ueda Y; Yoshino K; Fujita M; Morii E; Enomoto T; Kimura T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jun; 168(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 23395556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Adequacy of conization margins in adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix as a predictor of residual disease.
Im DD; Duska LR; Rosenshein NB
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Nov; 59(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 7590468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Large-loop excision of the transformation zone: effect on the pathologic interpretation of resection margins.
Montz FJ; Holschneider CH; Thompson LD
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):976-82. PubMed ID: 8497366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The status and distance of cone biopsy margins as a predictor of excision adequacy for endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ.
Goldstein NS; Mani A
Am J Clin Pathol; 1998 Jun; 109(6):727-32. PubMed ID: 9620030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Central pelvic recurrence 7 years after radical vaginal trachelectomy.
Bali A; Weekes A; Van Trappen P; Jeyarajah A; Querleu D
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):854-6. PubMed ID: 15721437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Residual and recurrent lesions after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Milojkovic M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2002 Jan; 76(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11818094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Invasive cervical adenocarcinoma immediately following a cone biopsy for adenocarcinoma in situ with negative margins.
Cohn DE; Morrison CD; Zanagnolo VL; Goist MM; Copeland LJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Jul; 98(1):158-60. PubMed ID: 15913738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Histological examination of the surgical specimen after hysterectomy in patients previously conized for intraepithelial neoplastic lesions of the cervix uteri. The problem of cytological recurrence and the incomplete cone].
Marchionni M; Ottaviano M; Battaglia GB; Campatelli C
Minerva Ginecol; 1976 Nov; 28(11):903-6. PubMed ID: 1012582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Cervical cone margins as a predictor for residual dysplasia in post-cone hysterectomy specimens.
Phelps JY; Ward JA; Szigeti J; Bowland CH; Mayer AR
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jul; 84(1):128-30. PubMed ID: 8008307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Endocervical gland involvement by cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III. Predictive value for residual and/or recurrent disease.
Demopoulos RI; Horowitz LF; Vamvakas EC
Cancer; 1991 Nov; 68(9):1932-6. PubMed ID: 1913543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: an experience with 100 cases.
Ostör AG; Duncan A; Quinn M; Rome R
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Nov; 79(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 11063645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [A falsely reassuring cervical smear in adenocarcinoma of the external os].
Rooker D; Baalbergen A; Helmerhorst TJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(17):977-80. PubMed ID: 18549169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Importance of surgical margins in conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III.
Murta EF; Resende AV; Souza MA; Adad SJ; Salum R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1999 Nov; 263(1-2):42-4. PubMed ID: 10728628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The role of loop electrosurgical excisional procedure in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
Kim JH; Park JY; Kim DY; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Jul; 145(1):100-3. PubMed ID: 19428171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Determination of residual lesion in remaining uterus after conization].
Sakaguchi Y
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 Jun; 38(6):924-32. PubMed ID: 3734521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Positive margin status in uterine cervix cone specimens is associated with persistent/recurrent high-grade dysplasia.
Shaco-Levy R; Eger G; Dreiher J; Benharroch D; Meirovitz M
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2014 Jan; 33(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 24300540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
