These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19092017)

  • 1. Alterations in femoral strain following hip resurfacing and total hip replacement.
    Deuel CR; Jamali AA; Stover SM; Hazelwood SJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Jan; 91(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19092017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Ong KL; Kurtz SM; Manley MT; Rushton N; Mohammed NA; Field RE
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1110-5. PubMed ID: 16877617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finite element modeling of resurfacing hip prosthesis: estimation of accuracy through experimental validation.
    Taddei F; Martelli S; Gill HS; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Feb; 132(2):021002. PubMed ID: 20370239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
    O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique.
    Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increased strain in the femoral neck following insertion of a resurfacing femoral prosthesis.
    Wik TS; Østbyhaug PO; Klaksvik J; Aamodt A
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Mar; 92(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 20190322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in femur stress after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: response to physiological loads.
    Little JP; Taddei F; Viceconti M; Murray DW; Gill HS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):440-8. PubMed ID: 17257719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Femoral component positioning in resurfacing arthroplasty--effects on cortical strains.
    Kummer FJ; Pereira G; Schachter AK; Jaffe WL
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(4):341-6. PubMed ID: 20001936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of femoral prosthesis design on cement strain in cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Peters CL; Bachus KN; Craig MA; Higginbotham TO
    J Arthroplasty; 2001 Feb; 16(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 11222897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur after hip resurfacing and uncemented total hip replacement: A prospective randomised controlled study.
    Smolders JM; Hol A; Rijnders T; van Susante JL
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Nov; 92(11):1509-14. PubMed ID: 21037344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in bone mineral density of the acetabulum, femoral neck and femoral shaft, after hip resurfacing and total hip replacement: two-year results from a randomised study.
    Penny JO; Brixen K; Varmarken JE; Ovesen O; Overgaard S
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Aug; 94(8):1036-44. PubMed ID: 22844043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Finite element analysis of changes in femoral stresses after elite total hip arthroplasty].
    He RX; Luo YM; Yan SG; Wu HB
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 84(18):1549-53. PubMed ID: 15500718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of bone removed during total hip arthroplasty with a resurfacing or conventional femoral component: a cadaveric study.
    Su EP; Sheehan M; Su SL
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Feb; 25(2):325-9. PubMed ID: 19056234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
    Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of total hip arthroplasty on the structural and biomechanical properties of adult bone.
    Peck JJ; Stout SD
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2009 Feb; 138(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 18773467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The development of a physiological hip prosthesis: evaluation of the strains after implantation of a prototype of hip implant: experiment in a dry femur.
    Vander Sloten J; Labey L; Van Audekercke R; Van der Perre G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1993; 3(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 8490530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design considerations for ceramic resurfaced femoral head: effect of interface characteristics on failure mechanisms.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2010; 13(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 19787497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement.
    Vendittoli PA; Lavigne M; Girard J; Roy AG
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Aug; 88(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 16877595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Changes of the bone mineral density of proximal femur after hip resurfacing arthroplasty].
    Lian YY; Yoo MC; Pei FX; Cheng JQ; Feng W; Cho YJ; Kim GI; Chun SW
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 45(16):1091-4. PubMed ID: 18005605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.