BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19092060)

  • 1. Use of DSM paraphilia diagnoses in sexually violent predator commitment cases.
    First MB; Halon RL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 19092060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Commentary: muddy diagnostic waters in the SVP courtroom.
    Prentky RA; Coward AI; Gabriel AM
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):455-8. PubMed ID: 19092061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Paraphilia NOS, nonconsent: not ready for the courtroom.
    Frances A; First MB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(4):555-61. PubMed ID: 22159984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Commentary: inventing diagnosis for civil commitment of rapists.
    Zander TK
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):459-69. PubMed ID: 19092062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examining the scope of questionable diagnostic reliability in Sexually Violent Predator (SVP) evaluations.
    Perillo AD; Spada AH; Calkins C; Jeglic EL
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 24274914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mental disorder, predisposition, prediction, and ability to control: evaluating sex offenders for civil commitment.
    Elwood RW
    Sex Abuse; 2009 Dec; 21(4):395-411. PubMed ID: 19901235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hebephilia: quintessence of diagnostic pretextuality.
    Franklin K
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(6):751-68. PubMed ID: 21110392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DSM-5 proposed diagnostic criteria for sexual paraphilias: tensions between diagnostic validity and forensic utility.
    Wakefield JC
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(3):195-209. PubMed ID: 21531463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexual sadism: avoiding its misuse in sexually violent predator evaluations.
    Frances A; Wollert R
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(3):409-16. PubMed ID: 22960924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Loathing the sinner, medicalizing the sin: why sexually violent predator statutes are unjust.
    Douard J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 17157910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A practical guide for the evaluation of sexual recidivism risk in mentally retarded sex offenders.
    Phenix A; Sreenivasan S
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):509-24. PubMed ID: 20018999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Paraphilic Coercive Disorder in the DSM: the right diagnosis for the right reasons.
    Stern P
    Arch Sex Behav; 2010 Dec; 39(6):1443-7. PubMed ID: 20567890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnosing and litigating hebephilia in sexually violent predator civil commitment proceedings.
    Fabian JM
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(4):496-505. PubMed ID: 22159977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Misuse of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Diagnosis in Sexually Violent Predator Cases.
    Frances A
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2020 Jun; 48(2):191-194. PubMed ID: 32385049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DSM-5 paraphilic diagnoses and SVP law.
    Tucker D; Brakel SJ
    Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Jun; 41(3):533. PubMed ID: 22218789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk communication in sexually violent predator hearings.
    Scott S; Gilcrist B; Thurston N; Huss MT
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):322-36. PubMed ID: 19908210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The management of sex offenders: perspectives for psychiatry.
    Saleh FM; Grudzinskas AJ; Malin HM; Dwyer RG
    Harv Rev Psychiatry; 2010; 18(6):359-68. PubMed ID: 21080774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The biasing effect of the "sexually violent predator" label on legal decisions.
    Scurich N; Gongola J; Krauss DA
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 47():109-14. PubMed ID: 27206709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Juror decision-making in a mock sexually violent predator trial: gender differences in the impact of divergent types of expert testimony.
    Guy LS; Edens JF
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(2):215-37. PubMed ID: 12645046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitional Impairment: Is There a Role for Cognitive Assessment in the Treatment of Individuals Civilly Committed Pursuant to the Sexually Violent Predator Act?
    Azizian A; Hutton S; Hughes D; Sreenivasan S
    Sex Abuse; 2016 Dec; 28(8):755-769. PubMed ID: 25698358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.