729 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19092092)
21. MR fat fraction mapping: a simple biomarker for liver steatosis quantification in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients.
Leitão HS; Paulino C; Rodrigues D; Gonçalves SI; Marques C; Carvalheiro M; Geraldes CF; Caseiro-Alves F
Acad Radiol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):957-61. PubMed ID: 23830602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Liver fat quantification: Comparison of dual-echo and triple-echo chemical shift MRI to MR spectroscopy.
Satkunasingham J; Besa C; Bane O; Shah A; de Oliveira A; Gilson WD; Kannengiesser S; Taouli B
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Aug; 84(8):1452-1458. PubMed ID: 26047820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of echo time pair selection on quantitative analysis for adrenal tumor characterization with in-phase and opposed-phase MR imaging: initial experience.
Schindera ST; Soher BJ; Delong DM; Dale BM; Merkle EM
Radiology; 2008 Jul; 248(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 18566172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fatty infiltration of the liver: quantification with phase-contrast MR imaging at 1.5 T vs biopsy.
Levenson H; Greensite F; Hoefs J; Friloux L; Applegate G; Silva E; Kanel G; Buxton R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Feb; 156(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 1898804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. MR imaging of the liver: comparison between single-shot echo-planar and half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequences.
Yamashita Y; Tang Y; Namimoto T; Mitsuzaki K; Takahashi M
Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 9577477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantitative assessment of intrahepatic lipids using fat-selective imaging with spectral-spatial excitation and in-/opposed-phase gradient echo imaging techniques within a study population of extremely obese patients: feasibility on a short, wide-bore MR scanner.
Springer F; Machann J; Schwenzer NF; Ballweg V; Würslin C; Schneider JH; Fritsche A; Claussen CD; Schick F
Invest Radiol; 2010 Aug; 45(8):484-90. PubMed ID: 20479651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quantification of hepatic steatosis: a comparison of the accuracy among multiple magnetic resonance techniques.
Wu CH; Ho MC; Jeng YM; Hsu CY; Liang PC; Hu RH; Lai HS; Shih TT
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Apr; 29(4):807-13. PubMed ID: 24224538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Liver fat: effect of hepatic iron deposition on evaluation with opposed-phase MR imaging.
Westphalen AC; Qayyum A; Yeh BM; Merriman RB; Lee JA; Lamba A; Lu Y; Coakley FV
Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):450-5. PubMed ID: 17255416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quantification of hepatic steatosis with T1-independent, T2-corrected MR imaging with spectral modeling of fat: blinded comparison with MR spectroscopy.
Meisamy S; Hines CD; Hamilton G; Sirlin CB; McKenzie CA; Yu H; Brittain JH; Reeder SB
Radiology; 2011 Mar; 258(3):767-75. PubMed ID: 21248233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dual gradient-echo in-phase and opposed-phase hepatic MR imaging: a useful tool for evaluating more than fatty infiltration or fatty sparing.
Merkle EM; Nelson RC
Radiographics; 2006; 26(5):1409-18. PubMed ID: 16973772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Liver imaging at 3.0 T: diffusion-induced black-blood echo-planar imaging with large anatomic volumetric coverage as an alternative for specific absorption rate-intensive echo-train spin-echo sequences: feasibility study.
van den Bos IC; Hussain SM; Krestin GP; Wielopolski PA
Radiology; 2008 Jul; 248(1):264-71. PubMed ID: 18566178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quantitative chemical shift-encoded MRI is an accurate method to quantify hepatic steatosis.
Kühn JP; Hernando D; Mensel B; Krüger PC; Ittermann T; Mayerle J; Hosten N; Reeder SB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(6):1494-501. PubMed ID: 24123655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quantification of hepatic steatosis with a multistep adaptive fitting MRI approach: prospective validation against MR spectroscopy.
Bashir MR; Zhong X; Nickel MD; Fananapazir G; Kannengiesser SA; Kiefer B; Dale BM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):297-306. PubMed ID: 25615751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Non-invasive quantification of hepatic steatosis in living, related liver donors using dual-echo Dixon imaging and single-voxel proton spectroscopy.
Krishan S; Jain D; Bathina Y; Kale A; Saraf N; Saigal S; Choudhary N; Baijal SS; Soin A
Clin Radiol; 2016 Jan; 71(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 26555703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Can a single-shot black-blood T2-weighted spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequence with sensitivity encoding replace the respiratory-triggered turbo spin-echo sequence for the liver? An optimization and feasibility study.
Hussain SM; De Becker J; Hop WC; Dwarkasing S; Wielopolski PA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Mar; 21(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 15723376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of chemical shift-encoded water-fat MRI and MR spectroscopy in quantification of marrow fat in postmenopausal females.
Li G; Xu Z; Gu H; Li X; Yuan W; Chang S; Fan J; Calimente H; Hu J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jan; 45(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 27341545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Fatty metamorphosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: detection with chemical shift gradient-echo MR imaging.
Martín J; Sentís M; Zidan A; Donoso L; Puig J; Falcó J; Bella R
Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 7892452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of Multi-Echo Dixon Methods with Volume Interpolated Breath-Hold Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fat-Signal Fraction Quantification of Paravertebral Muscle.
Yoo YH; Kim HS; Lee YH; Yoon CS; Paek MY; Yoo H; Kannengiesser S; Chung TS; Song HT; Suh JS; Kim S
Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(5):1086-95. PubMed ID: 26357503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results.
de Bazelaire CM; Duhamel GD; Rofsky NM; Alsop DC
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):652-9. PubMed ID: 14990831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
