220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19092232)
1. Assessment of differential item functioning.
Wang WC
J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(4):387-408. PubMed ID: 19092232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: toward a unified strategy.
Stark S; Chernyshenko OS; Drasgow F
J Appl Psychol; 2006 Nov; 91(6):1292-306. PubMed ID: 17100485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Test bias in a cognitive test: differential item functioning in the CASI.
Crane PK; van Belle G; Larson EB
Stat Med; 2004 Jan; 23(2):241-56. PubMed ID: 14716726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling effects of differential item functioning in polytomous items.
Wang WC
J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 12023558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of the common scale setting in the assessment of differential item functioning.
Huang HY
Psychol Rep; 2014 Feb; 114(1):104-25. PubMed ID: 24765713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving the quality and applicability of the Dutch scales of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired using item response theory.
Mokkink LB; Knol DL; van Nispen RM; Kramer SE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 53(3):556-71. PubMed ID: 20530379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Application of four procedures for detecting differential item functioning in polytomous items].
Elosua P; López-Jáuregui A
Psicothema; 2007 May; 19(2):329-36. PubMed ID: 17425906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [XS-DIF: program for analysis of Differential Item Functioning in Excel].
Ordóñez XG; Romero SJ
Psicothema; 2007 Feb; 19(1):171-2. PubMed ID: 17296000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Monte Carlo study of the impact of missing data and differential item functioning on theta estimates from two polytomous Rasch family models.
Furlow CF; Fouladi RT; Gagne P; Whittaker TA
J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(4):388-403. PubMed ID: 18250525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identifying measurement disturbance effects using Rasch item fit statistics and the Logit Residual Index.
Mount RE; Schumacker RE
J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(4):338-50. PubMed ID: 9803719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of multilevel logistic regression to identify the causes of differential item functioning.
Balluerka N; Gorostiaga A; Gómez-Benito J; Hidalgo MD
Psicothema; 2010 Nov; 22(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 21044547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exploring the Utility of Logistic Mixed Modeling Approaches to Simultaneously Investigate Item and Testlet DIF on Testlet-based Data.
Fukuhara H; Paek I
J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 26784379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the consistency of individual classification using short scales.
Emons WH; Sijtsma K; Meijer RR
Psychol Methods; 2007 Mar; 12(1):105-20. PubMed ID: 17402814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detecting differential item functioning with five standardized item-fit indices in the Rasch model.
Seol H
J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(3):233-47. PubMed ID: 10431491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploring differential item functioning (DIF) with the Rasch model: a comparison of gender differences on eighth grade science items in the United States and Spain.
Babiar TC
J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(2):144-64. PubMed ID: 22089511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Examining item difficulty and response time on perceptual ability test items.
Yang CL; O'Neill TR; Kramer GA
J Appl Meas; 2002; 3(3):282-99. PubMed ID: 12147914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interpretation of differential item functioning analyses using external review.
Scott NW; Fayers PM; Aaronson NK; Bottomley A; de Graeff A; Groenvold M; Gundy C; Koller M; Petersen MA; Sprangers MA; ;
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2010 Jun; 10(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 20545590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving the assessment of measurement invariance: Using regularization to select anchor items and identify differential item functioning.
Belzak WCM; Bauer DJ
Psychol Methods; 2020 Dec; 25(6):673-690. PubMed ID: 31916799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in clinical and nonclinical samples.
Meganck R; Vanheule S; Desmet M
Assessment; 2008 Mar; 15(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 18258730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differential item functioning on the Mini-Mental State Examination. An application of the Mantel-Haenszel and standardization procedures.
Dorans NJ; Kulick E
Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S107-14. PubMed ID: 17060817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
