These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19093622)

  • 21. The impact of display angles on the legibility of Sans-Serif 5 × 5 capitalized letters.
    Cai H; Li L
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Jul; 45(4):865-77. PubMed ID: 24290564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Recognition/confusion of dot matrix vs. conventional font capital letters.
    Geyer LH; Gupta SM
    Percept Psychophys; 1981 Mar; 29(3):280-2. PubMed ID: 7267280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. High and low luminance letters, acuity reserve, and font effects on reading speed.
    Yager D; Aquilante K; Plass R
    Vision Res; 1998 Sep; 38(17):2527-31. PubMed ID: 12116700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Towards a standardisation of reading charts: Font effects on reading performance-Times New Roman with serifs versus the sans serif font Helvetica.
    Daxer B; Radner W; Radner M; Benesch T; Ettl A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 Nov; 42(6):1180-1186. PubMed ID: 35972034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Recognition of letters in words and nonwords.
    Allegretti CL; Puglisi JT
    J Gen Psychol; 1982 Jul; 107(1st Half):139-48. PubMed ID: 7119756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measuring single-item identification efficiencies for letters and 3-D objects.
    Eidels A; Gold J
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Sep; 46(3):722-31. PubMed ID: 24254880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Emotional and persuasive perception of fonts.
    Juni S; Gross JS
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Feb; 106(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 18459353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Readability of computer display print enlarged for low vision.
    Bailey IL; Boyd LH; Boyd WL; Clark M
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1987 Sep; 64(9):678-85. PubMed ID: 3688188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Font tuning associated with expertise in letter perception.
    Gauthier I; Wong AC; Hayward WG; Cheung OS
    Perception; 2006; 35(4):541-59. PubMed ID: 16700295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Font regularity constraints on the process of letter recognition.
    Sanocki T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Aug; 14(3):472-80. PubMed ID: 2971774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Peripheral dysgraphia characterized by the co-occurrence of case substitutions in uppercase and letter substitutions in lowercase writing.
    Di Pietro M; Schnider A; Ptak R
    Cortex; 2011 Oct; 47(9):1038-51. PubMed ID: 21106191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of luminance contrast, colour combinations, font, and search time on brand icon legibility.
    Ko YH
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():33-40. PubMed ID: 28802453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of Hebrew letter names in early literacy: the case of multiphonemic acrophonic names.
    Levin I
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Dec; 98(4):193-216. PubMed ID: 17949738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Learning of letter names follows similar principles across languages: Evidence from Hebrew.
    Treiman R; Levin I; Kessler B
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Feb; 96(2):87-106. PubMed ID: 17046016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visually impaired observers require a larger window than normally sighted observers to read from a scroll display.
    Fine EM; Peli E
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Jul; 67(7):390-6. PubMed ID: 8888864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An alternative for judging confusability of visual letters.
    Thorson G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Feb; 42(1):116-8. PubMed ID: 1256962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The impact of letter spacing on reading: a test of the bigram coding hypothesis.
    Vinckier F; Qiao E; Pallier C; Dehaene S; Cohen L
    J Vis; 2011 May; 11(6):1-21. PubMed ID: 21566152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A matter of font type: The effect of serifs on the evaluation of scientific abstracts.
    Kaspar K; Wehlitz T; von Knobelsdorff S; Wulf T; von Saldern MA
    Int J Psychol; 2015 Oct; 50(5):372-8. PubMed ID: 25704872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do serifs help in comprehension of printed text? An experiment with Cyrillic readers.
    Akhmadeeva L; Tukhvatullin I; Veytsman B
    Vision Res; 2012 Jul; 65():21-4. PubMed ID: 22705332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dimensions of good and poor handwriting legibility in first and second graders: motor programs, visual-spatial arrangement, and letter formation parameter setting.
    Graham S; Struck M; Santoro J; Berninger VW
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2006; 29(1):43-60. PubMed ID: 16390288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.