143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19095407)
21. Color-coded automated signal intensity curves for detection and characterization of breast lesions: preliminary evaluation of a new software package for integrated magnetic resonance-based breast imaging.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Venditti F; Ercolani M; Carotenuto L; Padula S; Moriconi E; Roselli A; Giacomelli L; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2005 Jul; 40(7):448-57. PubMed ID: 15973137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Characterization of spatiotemporal changes for the classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic-resonance breast lesions.
Milenković J; Hertl K; Košir A; Zibert J; Tasič JF
Artif Intell Med; 2013 Jun; 58(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 23548472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI for characterizing intratesticular mass lesions.
Tsili AC; Argyropoulou MI; Astrakas LG; Ntoulia EA; Giannakis D; Sofikitis N; Tsampoulas K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):578-85. PubMed ID: 23436847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Digital mammography using iodine-based contrast media: initial clinical experience with dynamic contrast medium enhancement.
Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Jeunehomme F; Muller S; Hamm B; Bick U
Invest Radiol; 2005 Jul; 40(7):397-404. PubMed ID: 15973130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
Dromain C; Balleyguier C; Adler G; Garbay JR; Delaloge S
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 18790584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Digital mammography: clinical image evaluation.
Bassett LW; Hoyt AC; Oshiro T
Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):903-15. PubMed ID: 20868893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach.
Baltzer PA; Freiberg C; Beger S; Vag T; Dietzel M; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1070-6. PubMed ID: 19523854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Gadobenate dimeglumine as a contrast agent for dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging: effect of higher initial enhancement thresholds on diagnostic performance.
Sardanelli F; Fausto A; Esseridou A; Di Leo G; Kirchin MA
Invest Radiol; 2008 Apr; 43(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 18340247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A new algorithm for automatic vascular mapping of DCE-MRI of the breast: Clinical application of a potential new biomarker.
Vignati A; Giannini V; Carbonaro LA; Bertotto I; Martincich L; Sardanelli F; Regge D
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Dec; 117(3):482-8. PubMed ID: 25262335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A simple and robust classification tree for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions in MR-mammography.
Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Kaiser WA
Eur Radiol; 2013 Aug; 23(8):2051-60. PubMed ID: 23579418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fusion of contrast-enhanced breast MR and mammographic imaging data.
Behrenbruch CP; Marias K; Armitage PA; Yam M; Moore N; English RE; Clarke J; Brady M
Med Image Anal; 2003 Sep; 7(3):311-40. PubMed ID: 12946471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Exploiting sparsity in x-f space for higher spatiotemporal resolution in breast dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI.
Usman M; Ramsay EA; Siegler P; Plewes DB; Chan RW
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S171-3. PubMed ID: 23083578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Do mammography, sonography, and MR mammography have a diagnostic benefit compared with mammography and sonography?
Müller-Schimpfle M; Stoll P; Stern W; Kurz S; Dammann F; Claussen CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1323-9. PubMed ID: 9129436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Characterization of the enhancing lesions on dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with interstitial mammoplasty.
Kim TY; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Kim HS; Cha ES; Kim JY; Song BJ
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2205-11. PubMed ID: 24103354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Classification of breast mass lesions using model-based analysis of the characteristic kinetic curve derived from fuzzy c-means clustering.
Chang YC; Huang YH; Huang CS; Chang PK; Chen JH; Chang RF
Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Apr; 30(3):312-22. PubMed ID: 22245697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Detection of breast malignancy: diagnostic MR protocol for improved specificity.
Huang W; Fisher PR; Dulaimy K; Tudorica LA; O'Hea B; Button TM
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):585-91. PubMed ID: 15205478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Borderline breast lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy: can magnetic resonance mammography rule out associated malignancy? Preliminary results based on 79 surgically excised lesions.
Linda A; Zuiani C; Bazzocchi M; Furlan A; Londero V
Breast; 2008 Apr; 17(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 18083514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Contrast enhanced spectral mammography: better than MRI?
Thibault F; Balleyguier C; Tardivon A; Dromain C
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S162-4. PubMed ID: 23083575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
