441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19095473)
1. A comparative study of two noninvasive techniques to evaluate implant stability: Periotest and Osstell Mentor.
Oh JS; Kim SG; Lim SC; Ong JL
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 19095473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical study of the relationship between implant stability measurements using Periotest and Osstell mentor and bone quality assessment.
Oh JS; Kim SG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Mar; 113(3):e35-40. PubMed ID: 22669155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement of dental implant stability by resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment: comparison of both techniques in a clinical trial.
Zix J; Hug S; Kessler-Liechti G; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):525-30. PubMed ID: 18700378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: I. Instrument positioning, bone structure, implant length.
Sim CP; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jun; 21(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 20666786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants.
Sul YT; Jönsson J; Yoon GS; Johansson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: II. Implant surface modifications and implant diameter.
Han J; Lulic M; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jun; 21(6):605-11. PubMed ID: 20666787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs.
Strnad J; Urban K; Povysil C; Strnad Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 18700375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis of dental implant systems in an animal model with loaded implants.
Al-Nawas B; Wagner W; Grötz KA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):726-32. PubMed ID: 17066633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parameters of implant stability measurements based on resonance frequency and damping capacity: a comparative finite element analysis.
Winter W; Möhrle S; Holst S; Karl M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):532-9. PubMed ID: 20556252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The ankylos endosseous dental implant: assessment of stability up to 18 months with the Periotest.
Morris HF; Winkler S; Ochi S
J Oral Implantol; 2000; 26(4):291-9. PubMed ID: 11831235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part I: an in vitro study on measurement reliability and a method of comparison in the determination of primary dental implant stability.
Lachmann S; Jäger B; Axmann D; Gomez-Roman G; Groten M; Weber H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 16441787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Parameters of resonance frequency measurement values: a retrospective study of 385 ITI dental implants.
Karl M; Graef F; Heckmann S; Krafft T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Feb; 19(2):214-8. PubMed ID: 18067599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Initial stability measurement of dental implants placed in different anatomical regions of fresh human cadaver jawbone.
Seong WJ; Holte JE; Holtan JR; Olin PS; Hodges JS; Ko CC
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):425-34. PubMed ID: 18514664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Six-month performance of implants with oxidized and machined surfaces restored at 2, 4, and 6 weeks postimplantation in adult beagle dogs.
Knobloch L; Larsen PA; Rashid B; Carr AB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 15214218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized clinical 1-year trial comparing two types of non-submerged dental implants.
Park JC; Ha SR; Kim SM; Kim MJ; Lee JB; Lee JH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 20070756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A short-term study on immediate functional loading and immediate nonfunctional loading implant in dogs: histomorphometric evaluation of bone reaction.
Lee JY; Kim SG; Moon SY; Lim SC; Ong JL; Lee KM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 18996029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stability of implants and natural teeth as determined by the Periotest over 60 months of function.
Winkler S; Morris HF; Spray JR
J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(4):198-203. PubMed ID: 12500879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part 2: peri-implant bone loss follow-up. An in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell instruments.
Lachmann S; Laval JY; Jäger B; Axmann D; Gomez-Roman G; Groten M; Weber H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 16441788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting osseointegration by means of implant primary stability.
Nedir R; Bischof M; Szmukler-Moncler S; Bernard JP; Samson J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Oct; 15(5):520-8. PubMed ID: 15355393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanical state assessment of the implant-bone continuum: a better understanding of the Periotest method.
Tricio J; Laohapand P; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M; Naert I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 7615316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
