171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19095816)
1. Optimizing the tube potential for lumbar spine radiography with a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H; Norrman E; Persliden J
Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):62-8. PubMed ID: 19095816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Varied tube potential with constant effective dose at lumbar spine radiography using a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H; Persliden J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):240-5. PubMed ID: 15933115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
Busch HP; Busch S; Decker C; Schilz C
Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low-dose computed tomography of the lumbar spine: a phantom study on imaging parameters and image quality.
Alshamari M; Geijer M; Norrman E; Geijer H
Acta Radiol; 2014 Sep; 55(7):824-32. PubMed ID: 24215904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model.
Ludwig K; Ahlers K; Wormanns D; Freund M; Bernhardt TM; Diederich S; Heindel W
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 12925714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization of image process parameters through factorial experiments using a flat panel detector.
Norrman E; Geijer H; Persliden J
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(17):5263-76. PubMed ID: 17762085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
Tingberg A; Sjöström D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H
Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector system: realistic phantom study.
Kuwahara C; Aoki T; Oda N; Kawabata J; Sugimoto K; Kobayashi M; Fujii M; Korogi Y
Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4538-4543. PubMed ID: 30737566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A factorial experiment on image quality and radiation dose.
Norrman E; Persliden J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):246-52. PubMed ID: 15933116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimisation of tube voltage for conventional urography using a Gd2O2S:Tb flat panel detector.
Zachrisson S; Hansson J; Cederblad A; Geterud K; Båth M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):86-91. PubMed ID: 20223848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image quality vs. radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study.
Geijer H; Beckman KW; Andersson T; Persliden J
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1704-9. PubMed ID: 11511892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of x-ray tube potential on image quality and patient dose for lumbar spine computed radiography examinations.
Brindhaban A; Al Khalifah K; Al Wathiqi G; Al Ostath H
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Dec; 28(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 16506618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Possibilities of dose reduction in lateral cephalometric radiographs and its effects on clinical diagnostics.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17329587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reducing the radiation dose during excretory urography: flat-panel silicon x-ray detector versus computed radiography.
Zähringer M; Hesselmann V; Schulte O; Kamm KF; Braun W; Haupt G; Krug B; Lackner K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):931-7. PubMed ID: 14500204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose optimisation in computed radiography.
Schreiner-Karoussou A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16461522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
