These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19095914)
1. Science policy. Report faults U.S. strategy for nanotoxicology research. Service RF Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1779. PubMed ID: 19095914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Science policy. Priorities needed for nano-risk research and development. Service RF Science; 2006 Oct; 314(5796):45. PubMed ID: 17023629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. U.S. science policy. Obama courts a smitten audience at the national academy. Mervis J Science; 2009 May; 324(5927):576-7. PubMed ID: 19407168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Science and government. Improving science and technology advice for Congress. Morgan MG; Houghton A; Gibbons JH Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5537):1999-2000. PubMed ID: 11557862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. U.S. science policy. Panel explores what it'll take to keep universities strong. Mervis J Science; 2010 Jul; 329(5988):126-7. PubMed ID: 20616237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. U.S. science policy. Senate panel backs social sciences at NSF. Mervis J Science; 2006 May; 312(5777):1117. PubMed ID: 16728601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Science policy. Biosummit seeks to draw Obama's attention to the life sciences. Marshall E Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5908):1623. PubMed ID: 19074321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. US animal biotech regulations "may not be adequate". Fox JL Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Oct; 20(10):959. PubMed ID: 12355099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Science and regulation. FDA's approach to regulation of products of nanotechnology. Hamburg MA Science; 2012 Apr; 336(6079):299-300. PubMed ID: 22517845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. U.S. national academies. Advice on science advising leaves plenty of questions. Mervis J Science; 2004 Nov; 306(5701):1450-1. PubMed ID: 15567817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Counterterrorism. U.S. science agencies begin to lend a hand. Malakoff D; Koenig R Science; 2001 Oct; 294(5543):761-2. PubMed ID: 11679639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Committee calls for framework to assess the safety of nanotechnology materials. Mitka M JAMA; 2012 Mar; 307(11):1123-4. PubMed ID: 22436940 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Regulatory policy. U.S. panel urges clearer, cleaner role for science. Mervis J Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5942):799. PubMed ID: 19679776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Research ethics. The NIH draft guidelines on human stem cell research. Majumder MA; Cohen CB Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5935):1648-9. PubMed ID: 19556488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials, Part I: evaluating the human health implications of exposure to nanoscale materials. Thomas K; Sayre P Toxicol Sci; 2005 Oct; 87(2):316-21. PubMed ID: 16049265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Science policy. Proposed U.S. policy for ocean, coast, and Great Lakes stewardship. Lubchenco J; Sutley N Science; 2010 Jun; 328(5985):1485-6. PubMed ID: 20558691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Marine sciences. U.S. poised to adopt national ocean policy. Stokstad E Science; 2009 Dec; 326(5960):1618. PubMed ID: 20019268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Science policy. NSF begins a push to measure societal impacts of research. Mervis J Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5772):347. PubMed ID: 16627704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. U.S. regulatory policy. Courts ruled no forum for data-quality fights. Kaiser J Science; 2006 Mar; 311(5767):1536. PubMed ID: 16543423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. U.S. science policy. Report tells NSF to think more boldly. Mervis J Science; 2007 Mar; 315(5817):1352-3. PubMed ID: 17347421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]