These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19096049)

  • 1. Importance of peer-reviewed science in the debates on public policy.
    Scanes CG
    Poult Sci; 2009 Jan; 88(1):1. PubMed ID: 19096049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lesson for science.
    Krowitz EJ
    Nature; 1991 Aug; 352(6338):751. PubMed ID: 1652690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hunting inquiry.
    Thomas LH; Allen WR
    Vet Rec; 2000 Jul; 147(2):55-6. PubMed ID: 10955898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Newsmaker interview: Hamid Ahmed and Samir Raouf. Iraq banks on peer review to rebuild its research base. Interview by Yudhijit Bhattacharjee.
    Ahmed H; Raouf S
    Science; 2010 Oct; 330(6003):438. PubMed ID: 20966226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neutering of dogs.
    Gardiner AA
    Vet Rec; 2001 Jan; 148(1):28. PubMed ID: 11200406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Qualitative science policy.
    Mitcham C
    Qual Health Res; 2007 Dec; 17(10):1434-41. PubMed ID: 18000082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Animal research. Reliability of protocol reviews for animal research.
    Plous S; Herzog H
    Science; 2001 Jul; 293(5530):608-9. PubMed ID: 11474086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incorporating science into decision-making.
    Karl HA; Turner CE
    Science; 2003 May; 300(5624):1370. PubMed ID: 12775819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Legislating peer review in the Endangered Species Act.
    Male T
    Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 16492177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review--still the well-functioning quality control and enhancer in scientific research.
    Isohanni M
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2005 Sep; 112(3):165-6. PubMed ID: 16095469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Commentary on Cicchetti's "reliability of peer review".
    Colliver JA
    Teach Learn Med; 2002; 14(3):142-3. PubMed ID: 12189632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. We need a measured approach to metrics.
    Wilsdon J
    Nature; 2015 Jul; 523(7559):129. PubMed ID: 26156338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The importance of being 'in charge': a compromise for co-PIs.
    Rozmiarek H; Rall G
    Lab Anim (NY); 2007 Jan; 36(1):16. PubMed ID: 17183334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Research as a subject--for research].
    Larsen PO
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1999 Oct; 161(41):5667-8. PubMed ID: 10565235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The importance of being 'in charge': the buck stops where?
    Coan PN; Hill WA
    Lab Anim (NY); 2007 Jan; 36(1):18. PubMed ID: 17183338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The importance of being 'in charge': increase PI involvement.
    Scott-Emuakpor J
    Lab Anim (NY); 2007 Jan; 36(1):18. PubMed ID: 17183337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functions of an institutional a review board and the protection of human subjects.
    Brown JH
    Fed Proc; 1979 Jun; 38(7):2049-50. PubMed ID: 376351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Good review.
    Nat Cell Biol; 2008 Apr; 10(4):371. PubMed ID: 18379593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Public policy on animal experiments].
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1986 Sep; 130(38):1719-21. PubMed ID: 3762779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Putting science to work in developing a climate policy.
    Cicerone RJ
    ChemSusChem; 2009; 2(5):393-4. PubMed ID: 19418502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.