These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19099017)
41. New Online Manuscript Submission System of Balkan Medical Journal. Koçak Z; Çalıyurt O Balkan Med J; 2019 Jan; 36(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 30563308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Reference accuracy: authors', reviewers', editors', and publishers' contributions. Barroga EF J Korean Med Sci; 2014 Dec; 29(12):1587-9. PubMed ID: 25469055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Peer review: does it work? Nahai F Aesthet Surg J; 2010 Jan; 30(1):110-1. PubMed ID: 20442084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Fraud in biomedical science. Satyanarayana K Natl Med J India; 1992; 5(3):134-6. PubMed ID: 1304290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Editorial: premature publishing and over-fragmentation. Tarzia G ChemMedChem; 2013 Jan; 8(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 23281336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Post Publication Peer Review: Is it Coming to Your Nursing Journal? Pierson CA J Am Assoc Nurse Pract; 2016 Jun; 28(6):286. PubMed ID: 27273106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. A two-step manuscript submission process can reduce publication bias. Smulders YM J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 66(9):946-7. PubMed ID: 23845183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Electronic publishing in radiology: beginnings, current status, and expanding horizons. Chew FS; Llewellyn K; Olsen KM J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Oct; 1(10):741-8. PubMed ID: 17411694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Internet and scientific publishing. van Mil F Pharm World Sci; 2003 Dec; 25(6):243. PubMed ID: 14689809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. The peer review process: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Panda S Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2019; 85(3):239-245. PubMed ID: 30971533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Medicine and the Internet in the new millennium. Jabre JF J Med Liban; 2000; 48(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 10881436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Medical ethics: funding the discourse. Roy N Issues Med Ethics; 2002; 10(2):20-1. PubMed ID: 16334924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Things We Learned Along the Way: Our Virtual World and the Electronic Era. Berquist TH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Sep; 213(3):483-484. PubMed ID: 31437030 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Rapid publication for selected JAAD articles. Blauvelt A; Bernhard J J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Feb; 50(2):299-300. PubMed ID: 14726892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Editors and auditors. Rennie D JAMA; 1989 May; 261(17):2543-5. PubMed ID: 2704114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. #OpenAccess: Free online, open-access crowdsource-reviewed publishing is the future; traditional peer-reviewed journals are on the way out. Adler JR; Chan TM; Blain JB; Thoma B; Atkinson P CJEM; 2019 Jan; 21(1):11-14. PubMed ID: 30686272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. What's in a Discussion section? Exploiting 2-dimensionality in the online world…. Bioessays; 2016 Dec; 38(12):1185. PubMed ID: 27883229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Flaws documented, reforms debated at congress on journal peer review. Cotton P JAMA; 1993 Dec; 270(23):2775-8. PubMed ID: 8133598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Peer review is essential for both print and electronic publications. Weller AC MedGenMed; 2001 Nov; 3(4):5. PubMed ID: 11965200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]