These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19100305)

  • 1. Murine models for evaluating the allergenicity of novel proteins and foods.
    Aldemir H; Bars R; Herouet-Guicheney C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S52-7. PubMed ID: 19100305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying food proteins with allergenic potential: evolution of approaches to safety assessment and research to provide additional tools.
    Ladics GS; Selgrade MK
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 19028539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current codex guidelines for assessment of potential protein allergenicity.
    Ladics GS
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 46 Suppl 10():S20-3. PubMed ID: 18708115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utility of rodent models for evaluating protein allergenicity.
    Bowman CC; Selgrade MK
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 18957311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of allergenicity of genetically modified soybean protein extract in a murine model of oral allergen-specific sensitization.
    Gizzarelli F; Corinti S; Barletta B; Iacovacci P; Brunetto B; Butteroni C; Afferni C; Onori R; Miraglia M; Panzini G; Di Felice G; Tinghino R
    Clin Exp Allergy; 2006 Feb; 36(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 16433863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Will genetically modified foods be allergenic?
    Taylor SL; Hefle SL
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2001 May; 107(5):765-71. PubMed ID: 11344340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetically modified plants and food hypersensitivity diseases: usage and implications of experimental models for risk assessment.
    Prescott VE; Hogan SP
    Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Aug; 111(2):374-83. PubMed ID: 16364445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in allergenic potential of food extracts following oral exposure in mice reflect differences in digestibility: potential approaches to safety assessment.
    Bowman CC; Selgrade MK
    Toxicol Sci; 2008 Mar; 102(1):100-9. PubMed ID: 18033772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protein allergenicity in mice: a potential approach for hazard identification.
    Atherton KT; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2002 May; 964():163-71. PubMed ID: 12023203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientific advancement of novel protein allergenicity evaluation: an overview of work from the HESI Protein Allergenicity Technical Committee (2000-2008).
    Thomas K; MacIntosh S; Bannon G; Herouet-Guicheney C; Holsapple M; Ladics G; McClain S; Vieths S; Woolhiser M; Privalle L
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2009 Jun; 47(6):1041-50. PubMed ID: 19425225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Animal models of protein allergenicity: potential benefits, pitfalls and challenges.
    Dearman RJ; Kimber I
    Clin Exp Allergy; 2009 Apr; 39(4):458-68. PubMed ID: 19178540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review of the development of methodology for evaluating the human allergenic potential of novel proteins.
    Taylor SL
    Mol Nutr Food Res; 2006 Jul; 50(7):604-9. PubMed ID: 16736463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Review of animal models designed to predict the potential allergenicity of novel proteins in genetically modified crops.
    Ladics GS; Knippels LM; Penninks AH; Bannon GA; Goodman RE; Herouet-Guicheney C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 56(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 19800379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recent advances using rodent models for predicting human allergenicity.
    Knippels LM; Penninks AH
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2005 Sep; 207(2 Suppl):157-60. PubMed ID: 15979661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Animal models for assessment of GMO allergenicity: advantages and limitations].
    Adel-Patient K; Wal JM
    Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol; 2004 Mar; 36(3):88-91. PubMed ID: 15137477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Heat stability, its measurement, and its lack of utility in the assessment of the potential allergenicity of novel proteins.
    Privalle L; Bannon G; Herman R; Ladics G; McClain S; Stagg N; Ward J; Herouet-Guicheney C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Dec; 61(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 21906650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A mouse model for food allergy using intraperitoneal sensitization.
    Dearman RJ; Kimber I
    Methods; 2007 Jan; 41(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 17161305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. IgE binding to proteins from sesame and assessment of allergenicity: implications for biotechnology?
    Orruño E; Morgan MR
    Biotechnol Lett; 2006 Dec; 28(23):1877-88. PubMed ID: 17028779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computational allergenicity prediction of transgenic proteins expressed in genetically modified crops.
    Verma AK; Misra A; Subash S; Das M; Dwivedi PD
    Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol; 2011 Sep; 33(3):410-22. PubMed ID: 20964517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inter-laboratory comparisons of assessment of the allergenic potential of proteins in mice.
    Herouet-Guicheney C; Aldemir H; Bars R; de Barbeyrac D; Kennel P; Rouquié D; Stahl BU; Kimber I; Dearman RJ
    J Appl Toxicol; 2009 Mar; 29(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 18937215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.