147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1910131)
21. From the Office of the General Counsel. The right to die after Cruzan.
Orentlicher D
JAMA; 1990 Nov; 264(18):2444-6. PubMed ID: 2232004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cruzan: clear and convincing? How can they?
Busalacchi P
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):6-7. PubMed ID: 2228592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical fallout from the Supreme Court decision on Nancy Cruzan: Chernobyl or Three Mile Island?
Pearlman RA
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1991 Jan; 39(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 1898957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Reconciling autonomy and the value of life.
Bopp J
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 May; 38(5):600-2. PubMed ID: 2332579
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Securing patients' right to refuse medical care: in praise of the Cruzan decision.
Emanuel EJ
Am J Med; 1992 Mar; 92(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 1546730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. In the Circuit Court of Jasper County, Missouri probate division at Carthage.
Issues Law Med; 1991; 6(4):433-4. PubMed ID: 2037464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. From the Office of the General Counsel. Cruzan v Director of Missouri Department of Health: an ethical and legal perspective.
Orentlicher D
JAMA; 1989 Nov; 262(20):2928-30. PubMed ID: 2810631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The constitutional dimensions of the right to refuse medically assisted nutrition and hydration: an analysis of Cruzan.
Karbal W
J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):241-8, 256. PubMed ID: 10113286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. USCC brief in Nancy Cruzan case: continued nutrition and hydration urged.
United States Catholic Conference
Origins; 1989 Oct; 19(21):345-51. PubMed ID: 11652554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Cruzan: clear and convincing? Missouri stands alone.
Colby WH
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):5-6. PubMed ID: 2121666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cruzan: On taking substituted judgment seriously.
Baron C
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 2228593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Medical decision-making and the "right to die" after Cruzan.
Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):5-143. PubMed ID: 1895764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Cruzan:A hostage to technology.
Cranford RE
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):9-10. PubMed ID: 2228595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The right to death.
Dworkin R
New York Rev Books; 1991 Jan; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 11653244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights.
Wing KR
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1990; 15(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 2081895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In the Supreme Court of the United States. No. 88-1503. Nancy Beth Cruzan, by her parents and co-guardians, Lester L. Cruzan, et ux., petitioners, v. Director, Missouri Department Health, et al.
Issues Law Med; 1990; 5(4):453-78. PubMed ID: 2108100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Justices find a right to die, but the majority sees need for clear proof of intent.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A1, A18, A19. PubMed ID: 11646758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Beyond Cruzan: individual rights, family autonomy and the persistent vegetative state.
Arras JD
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1991 Oct; 39(10):1018-24. PubMed ID: 1918774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Deciding life and death in the courtroom. From Quinlan to Cruzan, Glucksberg, and Vacco--a brief history and analysis of constitutional protection of the 'right to die'.
Gostin LO
JAMA; 1997 Nov; 278(18):1523-8. PubMed ID: 9363974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Identifying appropriate decision-makers and standards for decision.
Pollock SG
Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):63-5. PubMed ID: 1895767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
