These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
62. Withholding nutrition and hydration from an incompetent: implications. Hogue EE Pediatr Nurs; 1990; 16(5):474-5. PubMed ID: 2120672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. The Cruzan decision and critical care physicians. Sprung CL Crit Care Med; 1991 May; 19(5):598-9. PubMed ID: 2026020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Who decides if there is "triumph in the ultimate agony?" Constitutional theory and the emerging right to die with dignity. Goebel BC William Mary Law Rev; 1996; 37(2):827-901. PubMed ID: 12173637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. Nancy Cruzan dies, outlived by a debate over the right to die. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1990 Dec; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11646795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. The Cruzan decision: 9.5 theses for discussion. Meilaender G Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):1, 3-4. PubMed ID: 16038071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. The authority of families to make medical decisions for incompetent patients after the Cruzan decision. King PA Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):76-9. PubMed ID: 1895771 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. Persistent vegetative state and the right to die: the United States and Britain. Jennett B; Dyer C BMJ; 1991 May; 302(6787):1256-8. PubMed ID: 2043853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law. Allsopp ME Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Assessing quality of life: a response to Professor Kamisar. Robertson JA Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1243-52. PubMed ID: 11652582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. The bell tolls for a constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 1997 Oct; 337(15):1098-1103. PubMed ID: 9321541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. After Cruzan--the work to be done. Glover JJ; Lynn J J Am Geriatr Soc; 1991 Apr; 39(4):423-4. PubMed ID: 2010595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. When is there a constitutional "right to die"? When is there no constitutional "right to live". Kamisar Y Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1203-42. PubMed ID: 11652581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Letting patients die: legal and moral reflections. Kadish SH Calif Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 80(4):857-88. PubMed ID: 11652646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. The legal consensus about foregoing life-sustaining treatment: its status and its prospects. Meisel A Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1992 Dec; 2(4):309-45. PubMed ID: 10123320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. The role of families as surrogate decisionmakers after Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. Rushton CH; Hogue EE J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():219-38. PubMed ID: 10111247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. The Cruzan decision: an ethical perspective. Drane JF Pa Med; 1990 Dec; 93(12):24-7. PubMed ID: 2274332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Euthanasia and the right to die: Nancy Cruzan and New Mexico. Schwartz RL N M Law Rev; 1990; 20(3):675-700. PubMed ID: 12186059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Family matters: is big brother your next-of-kin? Lomasky LE Reason; 1990 Nov; 22(6):36-9. PubMed ID: 11652569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Right-to-die case gets first hearing in Supreme Court. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1989 Dec; ():A1, B26. PubMed ID: 11646739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]