592 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19101422)
1. Corneal architecture of femtosecond laser and microkeratome flaps imaged by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
von Jagow B; Kohnen T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 19101422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of corneal flap morphology using AS-OCT in LASIK with the WaveLight FS200 femtosecond laser versus a mechanical microkeratome.
Zhang Y; Chen YG; Xia YJ
J Refract Surg; 2013 May; 29(5):320-4. PubMed ID: 23659230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratomes for flap creation in laser in situ keratomileusis and effect of postoperative measurement interval on estimated femtosecond flap thickness.
Rosa AM; Neto Murta J; Quadrado MJ; Tavares C; Lobo C; Van Velze R; Castanheira-Dinis A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):833-8. PubMed ID: 19393881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Ziemer FEMTO LDV femtosecond laser and Moria M2 mechanical microkeratome.
Zhou Y; Zhang J; Tian L; Zhai C
J Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 28(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 22373033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of intraoperative subtraction pachymetry and postoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps.
Murakami Y; Manche EE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1879-83. PubMed ID: 21840682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Flap thickness reproducibility in laser in situ keratomileusis with a femtosecond laser: optical coherence tomography measurement.
Kim JH; Lee D; Rhee KI
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 34(1):132-6. PubMed ID: 18165093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy and reproducibility of artemis central flap thickness and visual outcomes of LASIK with the Carl Zeiss Meditec VisuMax femtosecond laser and MEL 80 excimer laser platforms.
Reinstein DZ; Archer TJ; Gobbe M; Johnson N
J Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 26(2):107-19. PubMed ID: 20163075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement of corneal curvature change after mechanical laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation and femtosecond laser flap creation.
Ortiz D; Alió JL; Piñero D
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 18242446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in the refractive index of the human corneal stroma during laser in situ keratomileusis. Effects of exposure time and method used to create the flap.
Patel S; Alió JL; Artola A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jul; 34(7):1077-82. PubMed ID: 18571072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Analysis of flap thickness by anterior segment optical coherence tomography in different flap preparation styles of excimer laser surgery].
Yu ZQ; Xu Y; Yao PJ; Qin B; Zhou XT; Chu RY
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Mar; 46(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 20450663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps created by 2 femtosecond lasers.
Zheng Y; Zhou Y; Zhang J; Liu Q; Zhai C; Wang Y
Cornea; 2015 Mar; 34(3):328-33. PubMed ID: 25603229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. AS-OCT as a tool for flap thickness measurement after femtosecond-assisted LASIK.
Kucumen RB; Yenerel NM; Gorgun E; Oral D; Altunsoy M; Utine CA; Ciftci F
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 21117582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of LASIK flap thickness and morphology between the Intralase 60- and 150-kHz femtosecond lasers.
Yu CQ; Manche EE
J Refract Surg; 2014 Dec; 30(12):827-30. PubMed ID: 25437481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 2 femtosecond lasers for laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation.
Zhang J; Zhou Y; Zhai C; Tian L
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):922-7. PubMed ID: 23688879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective contralateral eye study to compare 80- and 120-μm flap LASIK using the VisuMax femtosecond laser.
Lim DH; Keum JE; Ju WK; Lee JH; Chung TY; Chung ES
J Refract Surg; 2013 Jul; 29(7):462-8. PubMed ID: 23820228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of corneal flap thickness between primary eyes and fellow eyes using the Zyoptix XP microkeratome.
Ho T; Cheng AC; Lau S; Lam DS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2049-53. PubMed ID: 18053902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive factors of femtosecond laser flap thickness measured by online optical coherence pachymetry subtraction in sub-Bowman keratomileusis.
Pfaeffl WA; Kunze M; Zenk U; Pfaeffl MB; Schuster T; Lohmann C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1872-80. PubMed ID: 19006732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study.
Patel SV; Maguire LJ; McLaren JW; Hodge DO; Bourne WM
Ophthalmology; 2007 Aug; 114(8):1482-90. PubMed ID: 17350688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictability of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using a 200 kHz femtosecond laser.
Cummings AB; Cummings BK; Kelly GE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Mar; 39(3):378-85. PubMed ID: 23352500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective randomized comparison of four femtosecond LASIK flap thicknesses.
Prakash G; Agarwal A; Yadav A; Jacob S; Kumar DA; Agarwal A; Akhtar R
J Refract Surg; 2010 Jun; 26(6):392-402. PubMed ID: 20677726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
