These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19103247)
1. Letter to the editor in response to Forristal et al.: Improving the quality of risk assessments in Canada using a principle-based approach, regulatory toxicology and pharmacology 50 (2008) 336-344. Meek B Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Mar; 53(2):156-7; author reply 158. PubMed ID: 19103247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving the quality of risk assessments in Canada using a principle-based approach. Forristal PM; Wilke DL; McCarty LS Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Apr; 50(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 18321623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Environment and health: 9. The science of risk assessment. Bailar JC; Bailer AJ CMAJ; 2001 Feb; 164(4):503-6. PubMed ID: 11233872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk proposals of the 103rd Congress. Paxman D Drug Metab Rev; 1996; 28(1-2):245-67. PubMed ID: 8744601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The precautionary principle is incoherent. Peterson M Risk Anal; 2006 Jun; 26(3):595-601. PubMed ID: 16834620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. OMB proposes to harmonize risk assessments. Renner R Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Mar; 40(6):1724. PubMed ID: 16570589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Are environmental regulations keeping up with innovation? A case study of the nanotechnology industry. Fairbrother A; Fairbrother JR Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Jul; 72(5):1327-30. PubMed ID: 19423165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Decision-making in environmental radiation protection: using the ERICA Integrated Approach. Zinger I; Copplestone D; Howard BJ J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1510-8. PubMed ID: 18395308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Linguistic uncertainty in qualitative risk analysis and how to minimize it. Carey JM; Burgman MA Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1128():13-7. PubMed ID: 18469210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Environmental epidemiology and risk assessment. Brunekreef B Toxicol Lett; 2008 Aug; 180(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 18602771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The precautionary principle in times of intermingled uncertainty and risk: some regulatory complexities. van Asselt MB; Vos E Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):35-41. PubMed ID: 16304932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The precautionary principle: is it a threat to toxicological science? Goldstein BD Int J Toxicol; 2006; 25(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 16510351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Tier testing systems in toxicology and decision-making criteria for their use. Astill BD; Lockhart HB; Moses JB; Nasr A; Raleigh RL; Terhaar CJ Dev Toxicol Environ Sci; 1980; 8():441-52. PubMed ID: 7308044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Environmental risk assessment of chemicals and nanomaterials--The best foundation for regulatory decision-making? Syberg K; Hansen SF Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 541():784-794. PubMed ID: 26433335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Precaution: belief, regulatory system, and overarching principle. Raffensperger C; Schettler T; Myers N Int J Occup Environ Health; 2000; 6(4):266-9. PubMed ID: 11114119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]