These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19103348)
1. Prediction of the presence of invasive disease from the measurement of extent of malignant microcalcification on mammography and ductal carcinoma in situ grade at core biopsy. O'Flynn EA; Morel JC; Gonzalez J; Dutt N; Evans D; Wasan R; Michell MJ Clin Radiol; 2009 Feb; 64(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 19103348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic size of ductal carcinoma in situ does not predict the presence of an invasive focus. Wahedna Y; Evans AJ; Pinder SE; Ellis IO; Blamey RW; Geraghty JG Eur J Cancer; 2001 Mar; 37(4):459-62. PubMed ID: 11267854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictors of invasive breast cancer in mammographically detected microcalcification in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia, atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ and recommendations for a selective approach to sentinel lymph node biopsy. Catteau X; Simon P; Noël JC Pathol Res Pract; 2012 Apr; 208(4):217-20. PubMed ID: 22445178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictors of invasive disease in breast cancer when core biopsy demonstrates DCIS only. Dillon MF; McDermott EW; Quinn CM; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins N; Hill AD J Surg Oncol; 2006 Jun; 93(7):559-63. PubMed ID: 16705731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive factors for invasive cancer in surgical specimens following an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ after stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in microcalcification-only lesions. Gümüş H; Mills P; Fish D; Gümüş M; Cox K; Devalia H; Jones S; Jones P; Sever AR Diagn Interv Radiol; 2016; 22(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 26509833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How significant is detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in a breast screening programme? Kessar P; Perry N; Vinnicombe SJ; Hussain HK; Carpenter R; Wells CA Clin Radiol; 2002 Sep; 57(9):807-14. PubMed ID: 12384106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammographic predictors of the presence and size of invasive carcinomas associated with malignant microcalcification lesions without a mass. Stomper PC; Geradts J; Edge SB; Levine EG AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1679-84. PubMed ID: 14627596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lesion size is a major determinant of the mammographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ: findings from the Sloane project. Evans A; Clements K; Maxwell A; Bishop H; Hanby A; Lawrence G; Pinder SE; Clin Radiol; 2010 Mar; 65(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 20152272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of core biopsy for ductal carcinoma in situ and its implications for surgical practice. Dillon MF; Quinn CM; McDermott EW; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins N; Hill AD J Clin Pathol; 2006 Jul; 59(7):740-3. PubMed ID: 16803949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): overdiagnosis or an obligate precursor of invasive disease? Evans AJ; Pinder SE; Ellis IO; Wilson AR J Med Screen; 2001; 8(3):149-51. PubMed ID: 11678555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Visibility in ultrasonography as the strongest invasion predictor in ductal carcinoma in situ in a retrospective study]. Vrtelová P; Coufal O; Pavlík T; Bazout M; Fait V Klin Onkol; 2009; 22(6):278-83. PubMed ID: 20099746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A mass on breast imaging predicts coexisting invasive carcinoma in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. King TA; Farr GH; Cederbom GJ; Smetherman DH; Bolton JS; Stolier AJ; Fuhrman GM Am Surg; 2001 Sep; 67(9):907-12. PubMed ID: 11565774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors of invasion and axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: an analysis of 255 cases. Han JS; Molberg KH; Sarode V Breast J; 2011; 17(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 21545433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why is microcalcification missed on mammography? Peters G; Jones CM; Daniels K J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2013 Feb; 57(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 23374551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can Occult Invasive Disease in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Be Predicted Using Computer-extracted Mammographic Features? Shi B; Grimm LJ; Mazurowski MA; Baker JA; Marks JR; King LM; Maley CC; Hwang ES; Lo JY Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1139-1147. PubMed ID: 28506510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and DCIS with microinvasion of the breast. van la Parra RF; Ernst MF; Barneveld PC; Broekman JM; Rutten MJ; Bosscha K Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Jun; 34(6):631-5. PubMed ID: 17851019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital mammography screening: association between detection rate and nuclear grade of ductal carcinoma in situ. Weigel S; Heindel W; Heidinger O; Berkemeyer S; Hense HW Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 24475843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of mammography in predicting histological extent of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Chakrabarti J; Evans AJ; James J; Ellis IO; Pinder SE; Macmillan RD Eur J Surg Oncol; 2006 Dec; 32(10):1089-92. PubMed ID: 16872800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is there a role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ?: analysis of 587 cases. Goyal A; Douglas-Jones A; Monypenny I; Sweetland H; Stevens G; Mansel RE Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Aug; 98(3):311-4. PubMed ID: 16552627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]