These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19103974)

  • 1. Schematic knowledge changes what judgments of learning predict in a source memory task.
    Konopka AE; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jan; 37(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 19103974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age-related schema reliance of judgments of learning in predicting source memory.
    Shi LZ; Tang WH; Liu XP
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2012; 19(1-2):301-18. PubMed ID: 22168505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When is schematic knowledge used in source monitoring?
    Spaniol J; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):631-51. PubMed ID: 12109758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Familiarity and retrieval processes in delayed judgments of learning.
    Metcalfe J; Finn B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1084-97. PubMed ID: 18763893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".
    Bui Y; Pyc MA; Bailey H
    Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):771-783. PubMed ID: 29187067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall.
    Mazzoni G; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1263-74. PubMed ID: 8744965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Source memory in the absence of successful cued recall.
    Cook GI; Marsh RL; Hicks JL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):828-35. PubMed ID: 16822150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Features and feedback: enhancing metamnemonic knowledge at retrieval reduces source-monitoring errors.
    Lane SM; Roussel CC; Villa D; Morita SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1131-42. PubMed ID: 17983318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metacognitive illusions for auditory information: effects on monitoring and control.
    Rhodes MG; Castel AD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Jun; 16(3):550-4. PubMed ID: 19451383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Empirical analysis of the intrinsic-extrinsic distinction of judgments of learning (JOLs): effects of relatedness and serial position on JOLs.
    Dunlosky J; Matvey G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1180-91. PubMed ID: 11550746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of making judgments of learning on memory performance: Positive, negative, or both?
    Janes JL; Rivers ML; Dunlosky J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2356-2364. PubMed ID: 29611141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metacognitive differentiation of item memory and source memory in schema-based source monitoring.
    Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 May; 49(5):743-765. PubMed ID: 36521154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hindsight bias in metamemory: outcome knowledge influences the recollection of judgments of learning.
    Zimdahl MF; Undorf M
    Memory; 2021 May; 29(5):559-572. PubMed ID: 33896394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of metacognition and schematic support in younger and older adults' episodic memory.
    Whatley MC; Castel AD
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Apr; 50(3):601-616. PubMed ID: 33782860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The reactivation of associated information affects source monitoring.
    Ball BH; Marsh RL; Meeks JT; Hicks JL
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jul; 39(5):818-26. PubMed ID: 21286898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beliefs about memory decline in aging do not impact judgments of learning (JOLs): A challenge for belief-based explanations of JOLs.
    Tauber SK; Witherby AE; Dunlosky J
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1102-1119. PubMed ID: 30859406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Judgments of learning (JOLs) selectively improve memory depending on the type of test.
    Myers SJ; Rhodes MG; Hausman HE
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jul; 48(5):745-758. PubMed ID: 32124334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using the past to predict the future.
    Dougherty MR; Scheck P; Nelson TO; Narens L
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):1096-115. PubMed ID: 16496729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How cognitive conflict affects judgments of learning: Evaluating the contributions of processing fluency and metamemory beliefs.
    Li X; Chen G; Yang C
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):912-922. PubMed ID: 33675000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do different metamemory judgments tap the same underlying aspects of memory?
    Leonesio RJ; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 May; 16(3):464-7. PubMed ID: 2140404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.